i went with my neighbor to an outdoor shooting range in the pawnee national grasslands in colorado.
its about 2 hours northeast of denver.
it was awesome.
Yes, I understand. But whether gay or straight, I would tend not to include the words "Boy Scouts" in the context with Mass Spectrometers.
But again, that's just my opinion.
You're being ridiculous on purpose. That's not so much an opinion as a deflection.
it is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
Spiral arms are prominent, because they shine, have Luster that is coming from rather ~young stars. great BALLS of nuclear fire, that formed in these arms.
Citation required.
The spiral arms ARE standing, stationary PRESSURE WAVES, through which the galaxies mass rotates, revolves.
Utter nonsense. You don't grasp what a pressure wave is, much less what a galactic arm or pressure wave is. Citation required.
The Tides are staionary, moon-bound waves, through which the Oceans, crust rotates, revolves,
Already debunked nonsense.
That all these phenomena have obviously a common pattern to them, does not in my mind or statements mean that one or the other directly CAUSED them.
Utter nonsense AND not what you were earlier claiming. Stop lying.
Hormones do NOT CAUSE the moon, or the milky way to have standing waves, even if it FEELS like* it, sometimes. [ I liked the hormones generated when looking at the moon together]
Then you shouldn't have tried to link them. Also, as a reminder, when you were claiming you had a 2 year old (or the time you claimed you were off by a factor of 4 on her age), talking about her menstrual cycle was and is creepy.
it is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
We wiil not easily learn what really goes on if we do not mentally WORK at i ourselves. teaching ourselfs.
If my wording: "Balls" "Stationary Waves" "PUSHING 50 & 90" --- have sometimes double attendre, an outragious flavour, that is a sub-conscious reflex
You're making stuff up to support your uneducated ideas with zero support and trying to claim old age as an excuse. Please stop.
in me that triggers rejection, but, with the right Eyes, upon reflection elicits the "AHA" response.
AHA! You keep making stuff up!
If this is not a scientific forum, but I try to keep my assertions, wordings, well within published data. including
The MODIFIED, AMENDED, IMPROVED, bode idea.
You have yet to show the modified, amended and improved Bode-Titius hypotheses that can predict anything. Simply retrofitting it match observations (and at that having to have your basic math corrected) isn't much of anything useful. What can your amended, improved and modifiied hypothesis predict?
it is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
re the unkind, badly thought-out "utter nonsense" remark:
Stop whining.
when my son --1/ 5.2848101 my age-- comes home from school, we will try to post the reference I provided but you obviously did not read. Utter nonsense NOT. he did that for us to debunk the "no science with 5% spread" by posting typical science graph.
You tried to claim a spread in data points was the same as a 5% spread in predictions of a law. Good luck with that.
scientific papers about how the Balls in the universe generate/ respond to resonances, possibly galactic, surely solar.
Not an actual sentence.
Since the painful cycle is so strangely and loosely ~~~tied to the tide-charts, and the Tides are seen to be ~standing waves UNDER the moon, the comparison is not far fetched.
It actually ranges from 20 to 35 days, not really on a lunar cycle.
Even the Spiral- arm structures in Galaxies are standing, not moving waves.
They aren't waves at all. Utter nonsense from you.
it is in THEM that star-conception star-births take place. see CONNECTIONS thread.
Actually, most star formation occurs elsewhere. Are you seriously trying to connect menstrual cycles with orbital distances with galactic arms with stellar nurseries? KWAZY!
* taking your advise to be precise seriously.
Keep trying.
it is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
Vivian, does the RYTHM method of contra-CONCEPTION ring a bell for you? A ~ monthly cycle, that sweeps like a standing waves through families, a cycle that varies more than 5% especially as when you start PUSHING 50 ?
Yes, it's also notoriously unreliable. I would thinlk a 90 year old man would know that, but then, you think ovaries are related to standing waves, so... no, you don't know that.
so the LIAR comment is based on my age remarks. please cut& paste [which my skills do not allow], where I wrote: Iam 90 or to that effect. thanks
It's been posted many times. Just stop being a weasel. Before you were uneducated, now you are just a liar.
it is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
you have to reciprocate by reading, unclouded by pre-conceptions: -- Pushing 90 is also pulling 80, and--- another cryptic, explanatory prologos original:
You tried to create a very specific idea, that you were right at 90. Don't try to back out of it now that you've been caught lying. It's just embarassing for you. Don't pretend that you didn't try to create an idea and get a pass on being old and then got caught. Sad. Just sad that a man won't stand by his words. That's no kind of man at all.
If you do not correctly count the ~ 28 days in your month, you will end up count the ~ 9 month in the year. that should answer your "TWAT" remark.
Only one month has 28 days and, at that, not all the time, your "approximately" symbol not withstanding. You got caught, own up to it and move on. Otherwise this is all anyone will ever remember. Quit being a weasel, admit it and move on.
it is very difficult to knock a ball into a hole (like golf), throw it into a receiver's hands (american football) intercept it and knock it over the fence (american cricket).
or to put a sattelite at the right time at the right speed in the right direction in the right place to have it orbit another body, so :.
what ingenious natural & process is it, than can get 9+ zillions bodies to get into the right orbit simultaniously or sequentially and have them remain there for billions of years?
Caedes, he also tried to claim when he said is daughter was 2 he was off by over a factor of 4, making her either 17 or just over 1.5 months old. Or maybe he meant 8. Who know with this guy.
christianity began it's formation without the bible.
the bible, as we know it, is a collection of what were very old texts when they were assembled by christian leaders in the late second and third centuries because they were deemed to be inspired by god.. whether they really were inspired by god or not is now open to debate, but should they prove to not be, it should not undermine christianity as an establishment.. discuss......
Christianity was fractured into dozens of sects and belief systems. The foundation of modern Christianity depends on the Bible.
i went with my neighbor to an outdoor shooting range in the pawnee national grasslands in colorado.
its about 2 hours northeast of denver.
it was awesome.
You may disagree, but I think boy scouts should be able to build fires whether they are gay or not ... but that's just my 2 cents.
I think they should too.
But still, the point about actual ionized gas reactions is valid.
i went with my neighbor to an outdoor shooting range in the pawnee national grasslands in colorado.
its about 2 hours northeast of denver.
it was awesome.
And that raises a second issue. Is shooting to be another fun thing for a child to do before they can totally appreciate the consequences of a shooting mistake? Guns are serious business. Mistakes are made even by trained adults. The problem with guns is that you can't call that bullet back.
The same is true of fired. Should boy scouts not be allowed to build fires?
