according to plato, the universe thrives on its own, dies and gets rebornall on its own and within itself.
the wise symbolized this concept in ouroboros, a serpent eating its own tail.
[even more wonderful is the marvel called a fruit-bearing treeit does not even eat its own fruit, but simply subsists on mostly what we may consider as dirt/refuse; and trees collectively perform yet another marvel of photosynthesis that make use of our wastes and give us oxygen, food, water, shelter, fiber..........................................[http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/to-save-the-planet-dont-plant-trees.html?_r=0].
Neither. I believe in God, the Creator (when He did creating matters not) who does not intervene in the affairs of mankind.
He cannot logically have created mankind and at the sametime have not intervened in the affairs of mankind.
Which is it? You don't get it both ways.
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
Prologos, still waiting for you to back up your claims.
i am thinking of turning my house in to a ex-jw meeting place, getting bar, pool tables, ping-pong, foseball, pinball and kegs of beer on tap.
big screen singles pad for the local ex-jws to visit and hang out.
will this bug all the jws who live near by me, do they get weird around known apostates?.
So, you're plan is to be a jerk to bother the people around you and you're asking if it will bother people around you? Well, that depends entirely on whether or not you're good at being a jerk.
according to plato, the universe thrives on its own, dies and gets rebornall on its own and within itself.
the wise symbolized this concept in ouroboros, a serpent eating its own tail.
[even more wonderful is the marvel called a fruit-bearing treeit does not even eat its own fruit, but simply subsists on mostly what we may consider as dirt/refuse; and trees collectively perform yet another marvel of photosynthesis that make use of our wastes and give us oxygen, food, water, shelter, fiber..........................................[http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/to-save-the-planet-dont-plant-trees.html?_r=0].
I too believe Genesis 1:1
"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth."
Why?
according to plato, the universe thrives on its own, dies and gets rebornall on its own and within itself.
the wise symbolized this concept in ouroboros, a serpent eating its own tail.
[even more wonderful is the marvel called a fruit-bearing treeit does not even eat its own fruit, but simply subsists on mostly what we may consider as dirt/refuse; and trees collectively perform yet another marvel of photosynthesis that make use of our wastes and give us oxygen, food, water, shelter, fiber..........................................[http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/to-save-the-planet-dont-plant-trees.html?_r=0].
Yet here things could have been bit different. It seems those who disagreed did not read the post.
Ignorance wrapped in arrogance, pretending to know what others did and did not do. Why is it those that have the humility and secret knowledge act, when you scratch the surface, are ALWAYS the least informed and most arrogant?
Unfortunately, no one has commented on the essence of the posting!
Many, including myself, did. That's the "facile drivel" part.
according to plato, the universe thrives on its own, dies and gets rebornall on its own and within itself.
the wise symbolized this concept in ouroboros, a serpent eating its own tail.
[even more wonderful is the marvel called a fruit-bearing treeit does not even eat its own fruit, but simply subsists on mostly what we may consider as dirt/refuse; and trees collectively perform yet another marvel of photosynthesis that make use of our wastes and give us oxygen, food, water, shelter, fiber..........................................[http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/to-save-the-planet-dont-plant-trees.html?_r=0].
Thing is, if energy cannot be created or destroyed then how did all that energy get here in the first place?
Excellent question. The universe appears to have a net sum of zero energy.
according to plato, the universe thrives on its own, dies and gets rebornall on its own and within itself.
the wise symbolized this concept in ouroboros, a serpent eating its own tail.
[even more wonderful is the marvel called a fruit-bearing treeit does not even eat its own fruit, but simply subsists on mostly what we may consider as dirt/refuse; and trees collectively perform yet another marvel of photosynthesis that make use of our wastes and give us oxygen, food, water, shelter, fiber..........................................[http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/to-save-the-planet-dont-plant-trees.html?_r=0].
Those touting laws of physics should also consider the law of entropy and the law of cause and effect.
Reduced down, you said those touting the laws of physics should also consider the laws of physics.
Not a very good start to the drivel.
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
1) Filling the earth with water to top Mt. Everest would have INCREASED gravity AT THAT LEVEL by~ 1/1500 because of the added water weight (came from above) but
2) The weight of the ark would have been reduced by ~1/400 or 1/4 of 1 percent because of it's greater distance from the CG. so no big deal.
I would live to see the math and numbers that show increase gravity yet lowers weight. That's a completely contradictory result. I showed my numbers, you show yours.
3) The lifted atmosphere would have been thinned by 1/480 of its noemal density/pressure. That works out to a pressure drop equivalent to a 20 meter climb, to the roof of an average apartment block. ( based on an ~1% drop in pressure for every 100 m gain in altitude) so
Please do show that math as well. Earlier you said it would have dropped by 1/1000th, now you are saying (Without realizing it, I think), that at 10000 meters there is no atmosphere. I really truly would love to see how these numbers work.
talking of temperature/energy the FALL of such an amount of water, or any such mass, (40 with 21 zeros kg). Such lowering from any heights would convert a lot of potential energy into heat. done over only 40 days, you probably would need serious air conditioning, to say the least.
Please do also show that math. Earlier you thought it was like how the Hoover damn works with the heat, I've not notice any naturally occurring turbines in nature that generate heat. Curious as to how those numbers work.
Thanks!
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
The rising tide, flood lifts all vessels and the atmosphere.
sematics are way off topic. period.
This isn't semantics. Feel free to run away, but you made a lot of claims and now are suddenly, when asking for proof, deciding to run away. Brave brave Sir Robin.
Of course, you could always step up.
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
What I am saying is good enough. research it.
You contradicted yourself in two sentences. It's not only not good enough, it's not even acceptable in basic ... anything. Don't be lazy and live up to your word. You said you could show math. Put up or shut up.
