think the private mode will not save your settings Viviane. Or else it could be the cookie for this site needs to be deleted as it may be corrupt.
I am pretty sure private browsing will delete everything, that's why I suggested tying to the profile.
well, the switchover happened - there were a couple of things i had to fix which meant the posting was disabled for longer than i planned but it's now enabled and some people have already posted.. if you have any questions about the new format or suggestions on how to improve it, please post them here.. if you are having trouble signing in or posting then you'll need to email me instead.. many thanks to everyone for their patience during the changeover !.
think the private mode will not save your settings Viviane. Or else it could be the cookie for this site needs to be deleted as it may be corrupt.
I am pretty sure private browsing will delete everything, that's why I suggested tying to the profile.
well, the switchover happened - there were a couple of things i had to fix which meant the posting was disabled for longer than i planned but it's now enabled and some people have already posted.. if you have any questions about the new format or suggestions on how to improve it, please post them here.. if you are having trouble signing in or posting then you'll need to email me instead.. many thanks to everyone for their patience during the changeover !.
Another thing that could be nice is to remember our settings, like I change the views on everything to 20, turn off snippets, etc.Anytime I sign out and then back in I have re-do those. Remembering that, or maybe being able to set it as a profile preference would be nice.
I do use Firefox and have my browsing set to private mode.
i was watching the news and came upon an interview with brigitte gabriel on muslim extremists.
what caught my attention was the above quote.
the reason is, it brought back what an elder recently told me about our faith in the governing body.. i will paraphrase what he told me below:.
Evidently Sharia law has reared it's ugly head in Florida by the Democrats
You do realize the article you linked to say that is 100% backwards, right?
do you get confused sometimes whether this site is a discussion forum or a debating forum ?.
just asking.
whats your thoughts.. smiddy.
In a way they are like Jehovah's witnesses on steroids, they tear everything down.
That implies there is or should have been something of value there in the first place.
in audacity of hope he writes: i will stand with the muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
the quote comes from page 261 of the paperback edition of the audacity of hope.. he couildn't march in solidarity.
yesterday the "political winds shift" happened.
do you get confused sometimes whether this site is a discussion forum or a debating forum ?.
just asking.
whats your thoughts.. smiddy.
The only faith that is uncontested and encouraged here is atheism.
People here disagree with atheism all the time.Your statement is demonstrably untrue. Nor is atheism a faith of any sort.
in audacity of hope he writes: i will stand with the muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
the quote comes from page 261 of the paperback edition of the audacity of hope.. he couildn't march in solidarity.
yesterday the "political winds shift" happened.
Vivane, Ooh WT style DENIAL; you are clearley 100% blind to this president and his administration.
Denial? WTF are you talking about? Facts simply show that your claims could not possibly be more wrong or distorted. Not sure why you have an adversity to being less wrong.
in audacity of hope he writes: i will stand with the muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
the quote comes from page 261 of the paperback edition of the audacity of hope.. he couildn't march in solidarity.
yesterday the "political winds shift" happened.
In “Audacity of Hope” he writes: “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” The quote comes from page 261 of the paperback edition of “The Audacity of Hope.
Except that's not in any way true.
"future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."
Ooh, WT style selective cherry picking! Let's look at the full quote. It's not what you claim, BTW.
The future must not belong to those who target Coptic Christians in
Egypt – it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted
“Muslims, Christians, we are one.” The future must not belong to those
who bully women – it must be shaped by girls who go to school, and those
who stand for a world where our daughters can live their dreams just
like our sons. The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal
a country’s resources – it must be won by the students and
entrepreneurs; workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity
for all people. Those are the men and women that America stands with;
theirs is the vision we will support.
Sounds to me like Obama sympathizes with Jihadists. He had the audacity to utter these words before the UN over the Benghazi video. It's sicikening to think about him in his position as the POTUS
You are clearly 100% wrong in every conceivable way on these things.
i watched a documentary last night where they found old bones and spear heads in mexico.
this work was originally started in the 60s but they went back over the decades.
the main researcher dated the items at about 20,000 years old.
This in itself gives this documentary some merit.
Oh? Please explain specifically and clearly why a documentary by two non-scientist creationist pushing discredited, distorted and proven dishonest pseudoscience deserves any merit.
Is it being spun to some degree or is the story told with some bias? No doubt. But then we are all adults and can come to our own conclusions.
Given that all you are doing is pushing credence to pseudoscience and changing the subject as often as you can, not all of us are acting or thinking like adults.
i watched a documentary last night where they found old bones and spear heads in mexico.
this work was originally started in the 60s but they went back over the decades.
the main researcher dated the items at about 20,000 years old.
Just how "are two non-scientists creationists making standard anti-science and disproved creationist claims" in this video/documentary?
Hi, have you met Google? If not, Google wanted me to remind you that I'm not your research assistant. She also wanted me to let you know that, if you don't know anything about this video and the people behind it, maybe, just maybe, you shouldn't be debating it's merits. That's called an argument from ignorance. Google it!