richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
I quoted Richard Dawkins and posted a video of Richard Dawkins?
Where did I say anything?
Well, first you said you had not written commentary and then you did and now we don't know.
The point is, we've got some trouble with your veracity. We need tor straighten that out.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
Perhaps you could actually try listening to that little video in the OP, since my comments were a summary of exactly what Richard Dawkins said in the video?
FT, you claimed you made no commentary, now you say you did. Which is it? We can get to the truth of your commentary (or lack thereof) once we determine which of your statements is true.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
I believe that Richard Dawkins meme theory fuels the militancy of militant atheists. It probably also fuels his own militancy.
You've not shown us how studying science has anything to do with memes. Try again.
You also still owe us the evidence that what FT wrote is an accurate representation of what Dawkins said.
one or two of you have noticed that i use derogatory terms when talking about matters religion.
i offer no apology.
you do, however, deserve an explanation.. my father, bless him and now dead, was a survivor of belsen, the german concentration camp.
When he gets called a bully, he thinks it's terrible and says...
What a vile, evil, low-life.
But, when he is playing at being a bully, we get this...
You really don't wanna know what I would call christards if I wasn't on a public forum.
And then the bragging starts...
Yes, I have a business.
Yes, it is profitable - very - because I have put in an enormous amount of effort in order to be the very best that I can be.
Poor guy. He just needs attention and doesn't know how to get it. Being a bully doesn't get it, so he tries being a victim. When that doesn't work, tell us how awesome he is.
What you, 8?
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
viv, thats a pretty good description of your own tactics. you and cofty - both of you doing the same thing
And now you're doing PeeWee Herman to attempt to pretend others are guilty of your shortcomings.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
the evidence is in front of you - all you need to do is listen for two or three minutes.
do you even know what Dawkins says about memes?
OK, you've got nothing. You can't or won't back up your claims and now you're attempting to insinuate that I am somehow at fault.
It's a typical tactic, a sad and laughable tactic and one I am sad to see you turn to.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
viv; it is only a few minutes long - check it yourself
Don't be ridiculous. You made a claim, provide the evidence. Otherwise, why are you talking?
dawkins did not just coin the word meme. furthermore he ties memes to religion - so yes it does matter how much time spends doing science
Specifically, why does his time spent on science have anything to do with memes on religion? Tie the two things together with a cogent, reasoned argument that shows direct cause and effect. Otherwise, you've done nothing but make an empty claim.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
viv, in the recording Richard Dawkins does say what FT says he says.
Then please provide the time stamp and quote.
as I said in a previous post Dawkins empowers memes to such an extent that he gives them agency. I think this possibly stems from spending so much time study the natural histories of organsims.
Dawkins coined the word meme and how must time he spends doing science has nothing to do with is in particular.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
I hope you'll find most atheists just believe in one less god than the average deist.
There have been at least 30000 gods, deities, goddesses, etc., throughout history. Christians simply 0.000033% less atheist than we are.
last night a young man in a bar struck up a conversation with me.
our town is having our pride parade soon and he brought it up, the bible and how it's against the bible.
me being me, i said that i couldn't care less that it was against the bible and that it was a horrible guide for morality anyway.
You're a strange one Viv
Thank you.
The only strange thing is that are not more Vivs.
The World would be a far better place if there were.
Thank you, Phizzy.
Viviane this experience will surely make it to this years apostate Year Book... Praise Zeus!
Penthouse Letters at the very least, I hope!
