Posts by Viviane

174

The Bible is NOT Error-Free

by FusionTheism in

for many christians, the bible is viewed as the 100% error-free, perfect book straight from god, where every single word was carefully chosen by god for a reason.

but, usually, when you have a discussion on the topic, these christians will end up saying that only the original copies written directly from the hands of the prophets and apostles were error-free, and all manuscript copies since then are subject to copyist mistakes and other errors.. since zero original copies are in existence, how do we know the originals were error-free?

why should we think the originals should be error-free to begin with?

Viviane

Isn't the whole idea or rule of "burden of proof" equally as much man-made as atheists claim the Bible is?

No matter what the answer to that is, I wonder why you think that matters?

As a for instance, do you think I should be able to take out an ad in the newspaper, write books and articles, go on TV and claim tat Fusion Theism is sexually attracted to animals, once paid a farmer dress him up like a sheep and shear him and drunkenly killed a woman in 1999?

Are you OK with people making those claims without proof?

Why should I follow YOUR man-made rules instead of any other man-made rules?

No one said you should. Which rules are you against? More importantly, why are you against them? Is it because of the sheep thing you were caught doing?

174

The Bible is NOT Error-Free

by FusionTheism in

for many christians, the bible is viewed as the 100% error-free, perfect book straight from god, where every single word was carefully chosen by god for a reason.

but, usually, when you have a discussion on the topic, these christians will end up saying that only the original copies written directly from the hands of the prophets and apostles were error-free, and all manuscript copies since then are subject to copyist mistakes and other errors.. since zero original copies are in existence, how do we know the originals were error-free?

why should we think the originals should be error-free to begin with?

Viviane

And what does that have to do with with my statement that if the Bible is inspired, you are accountable to God with your conduct?

You're so adorable. You endorse a pro-rape and pro-slavery moral code, bring it up in a discussion about whether or not the Bible inspired, suggest I am fake account, suggest I am mentally unbalanced, attempt to dismiss me because of gender and now want me to make your point for you.

Good for you But stop remarking about me then and stick to the subject.

Oh my. Dear, you aren't man enough to tell me what to do. Besides, you're the one that brought feelings into it like some teenage girl with a crush. I can't make you stop or explain why you felt that was important to bring up.

When you figure out what your point was regarding accountability to god for not endorsing rape (as you do) on a thread about the inspiration of the Bible, let me know. Asking me is a waste of time since I can't read your mind.

174

The Bible is NOT Error-Free

by FusionTheism in

for many christians, the bible is viewed as the 100% error-free, perfect book straight from god, where every single word was carefully chosen by god for a reason.

but, usually, when you have a discussion on the topic, these christians will end up saying that only the original copies written directly from the hands of the prophets and apostles were error-free, and all manuscript copies since then are subject to copyist mistakes and other errors.. since zero original copies are in existence, how do we know the originals were error-free?

why should we think the originals should be error-free to begin with?

Viviane

What does your offending me have anything to do with whether Viv and Cofty are the same?

I like where this is going. Are Viv and Cofty the same... so far your evidence that we are the same is that we are nothing alike in your opinion. Does it count if we're physically the same person but with a split personality?

Does this mean that up is now down? Black is white, dogs and cats are the same?

109

The Confederate Flag

by Simon in

the latest controversy over the confederate flag just sums up to me the state of dysfunction that exists in american society.. in summary: a white supremacist nutter shoots 9 black people dead in a church.

he's clearly inspired by the messages of others which the confederate flag is often a symbol of.. it seems like a no-brainer to remove it.

not only isn't it removed, it isn't even lowered at all as a mark of respect.. and of course now there are the people who want to defend their right to have it.

Viviane

When I see someone flying the confederate flag I am thankful that we have the freedom to do so, even if it means that others might be offended. I don't prejudge them as stupid.

Being thankful for freedoms, not offended and knowing someone is stupid are not mutually exclusive. I have, with my own eyes, seen a confederate flag flown next to a picture of a lynching. I personally hear people make comments about the war of northern aggression and how everything was fine before the war.

When I see someone flying the flag, I absolutely know everything I need to about that person.

109

The Confederate Flag

by Simon in

the latest controversy over the confederate flag just sums up to me the state of dysfunction that exists in american society.. in summary: a white supremacist nutter shoots 9 black people dead in a church.

he's clearly inspired by the messages of others which the confederate flag is often a symbol of.. it seems like a no-brainer to remove it.

not only isn't it removed, it isn't even lowered at all as a mark of respect.. and of course now there are the people who want to defend their right to have it.

Viviane

Racism goes both ways, but you wouldn't know about the plague of black on white knockout game attacks
(some have been fatal) from watching/reading the mainstream news media.- gotta love that plague word- it's great

The "knock out game" was a myth.

109

The Confederate Flag

by Simon in

the latest controversy over the confederate flag just sums up to me the state of dysfunction that exists in american society.. in summary: a white supremacist nutter shoots 9 black people dead in a church.

he's clearly inspired by the messages of others which the confederate flag is often a symbol of.. it seems like a no-brainer to remove it.

not only isn't it removed, it isn't even lowered at all as a mark of respect.. and of course now there are the people who want to defend their right to have it.

Viviane

Read a book, and find the fundamentals of the KKK. It was enhanced by Nazi idealist and they continue that trait today, but Viviane you are pointless. I wont waste anymore of my time with arrogance. Just as slavery was brought into the conversation.

I've read many books. The KKK existed long before Hitler was born. Hitler did not and could have started the ideologies of the KKK. Just because that is true and you got called out on it is no reason for you to take your ball and go home or start calling names.

109

The Confederate Flag

by Simon in

the latest controversy over the confederate flag just sums up to me the state of dysfunction that exists in american society.. in summary: a white supremacist nutter shoots 9 black people dead in a church.

he's clearly inspired by the messages of others which the confederate flag is often a symbol of.. it seems like a no-brainer to remove it.

not only isn't it removed, it isn't even lowered at all as a mark of respect.. and of course now there are the people who want to defend their right to have it.

Viviane

I suppose, you have been following the news about Hillary Clinton's upcoming Rico lawsuit in Florida ( 2 weeks in January) on NBC news?

No such case exists. That's nothing to do, though, with WND being full of nutters, birthers and extremists.

you need to stop doing this--

An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, means responding to arguments by attacking a person's character, rather than to the content of their arguments.

I'll stop after I've, you know, actually done it. WND is a nuthouse. It's a joke. Calling it a joke is in no way attacking you. Grow up.

174

The Bible is NOT Error-Free

by FusionTheism in

for many christians, the bible is viewed as the 100% error-free, perfect book straight from god, where every single word was carefully chosen by god for a reason.

but, usually, when you have a discussion on the topic, these christians will end up saying that only the original copies written directly from the hands of the prophets and apostles were error-free, and all manuscript copies since then are subject to copyist mistakes and other errors.. since zero original copies are in existence, how do we know the originals were error-free?

why should we think the originals should be error-free to begin with?

Viviane

What does that have to do with the Bible being inspired?

I dunno. You brought the moral code of the Bible into it. If you'd no idea what you were talking about, I can't help you.

No he does not

Cofty routinely destroys your arguments. With ease.

No I have not. AND You have not shown what does that have to do with if the Bible is inspired, you are accountable to God?

Again, you brought up the pro-rape moral code, the one you endorse. How are you planning on linking the two? Are you going to say God is pro-rape? Rape inspires god? Rape inspires people to talk about god?

I just don't know where you are going to take this, but remember, YOU brought up being accountable for morality to God in this thread, YOU endorse the pro-rape moral code. It's not my job to link them together. It's yours.

What does your feelings about me have to do with if the Bible is inspired that you are accountable to the God of the Bible?

I have no feelings about you one way or the others.

174

The Bible is NOT Error-Free

by FusionTheism in

for many christians, the bible is viewed as the 100% error-free, perfect book straight from god, where every single word was carefully chosen by god for a reason.

but, usually, when you have a discussion on the topic, these christians will end up saying that only the original copies written directly from the hands of the prophets and apostles were error-free, and all manuscript copies since then are subject to copyist mistakes and other errors.. since zero original copies are in existence, how do we know the originals were error-free?

why should we think the originals should be error-free to begin with?

Viviane

What does that have to do with the Bible being inspired?

It's a good example of patriarchal thinking that you're OK with, putting women as second class. Cofty routinely destroy's your arguments and you make it plain that you don't like it. But, you've several times in this thread praised him and attempted to denigrate me personally Your posts make it clear that gender is a reason you feel particularly threatened and last out at me, in particular.

We've got FT on the one had pretending the Bible preaches morality for all and you endorsing a pro-rape, pro-slavery moral code while attempting to denigrate and mitigate someone because of their gender.

That's what it has to do with it, Fisherman. It's a shining example of how that second rate moral code enables you to feel justified in lashing out at you do. Your moral code would have me be a second class citizen and you, without even realizing it (I hope), are following right along.

Therefore, your moral code and go EABOD.

174

The Bible is NOT Error-Free

by FusionTheism in

for many christians, the bible is viewed as the 100% error-free, perfect book straight from god, where every single word was carefully chosen by god for a reason.

but, usually, when you have a discussion on the topic, these christians will end up saying that only the original copies written directly from the hands of the prophets and apostles were error-free, and all manuscript copies since then are subject to copyist mistakes and other errors.. since zero original copies are in existence, how do we know the originals were error-free?

why should we think the originals should be error-free to begin with?

Viviane

Again, then: Cofty aka Vivian?
And I am not the only poster on this Forum that has stated this suspicion. And not because of any similarities in thinking. Cofty's posts are logical. Vivian's post are remarks, deliberately disruptive, obfuscating, assertive, divertive, as if a device by another poster to MANipulate the thread.

Oh, look at that. A MANs posts are logical. A woman's, emotive and disruptive...

Could you be any more misogynist?