Posts by Viviane

449

Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific

by LAWHFol in

i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.

i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.

"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.

Viviane

And while some of you were debating words and semantics the rest of us were having some scotch in honor of Dionysus, a drink offering

And just how do you know I wasn't having a scotch as well as educating Control?

449

Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific

by LAWHFol in

i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.

i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.

"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.

Viviane

Is a perfect example of a ad hominem fallacy, as it is directed at my intellect.

Ah, exactly backwards. Had I said you were incapable of using logic, THAT would have been a personal attack. I didn't. I said the logic was crappy, not your intellect. Imagining that I am insulting you personally when commenting on your logic does not make it so, any more than believing in rib-ladies and talking snakes make then so.

449

Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific

by LAWHFol in

i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.

i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.

"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.

Viviane

Straw men arguments, personal attacks, play with words, avoiding the question/issue, ad hominem.
I conclude that you are a very knowledgeable idiot.

And thus we reach the part of the debate where you, unable to show any of your claims and all evidence is against you, it's time to go into butthurt mode.

Here you go...

449

Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific

by LAWHFol in

i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.

i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.

"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.

Viviane

No, you have expressed issues with my logic several times.

I have. But your claim was that you knew my opinion. That's an ignorant claim and faulty premise.

449

Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific

by LAWHFol in

i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.

i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.

"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.

Viviane

All of these are perfect examples of: ad hominem.

And know we know that you don't know what an ad hominem fallacy it. An ad hominem is an attack on YOU personally. I purely addressed the comments you made, therefore, despite how you personally felt, it was not an ad hominem fallacy.

(that, by the way, is an example of proper logic)

You are avoiding the question/questions.

Not at all. You said you had a ramification to show me. I've no way of reading your mind and knowing if you think a question is a ramification, the reverse, meant to show me a ramification and then ask a question but forgot to show the relevant ramification, if you realized you were making a class error in your logic, etc. I'm under no obligation to answer a question when it makes zero sense.

Validly construct your question without a class error and I will be happy to answer it.

449

Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific

by LAWHFol in

i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.

i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.

"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.

Viviane

LOL, when you argue against a point I am making, your opinion is probably that there is a logical or factual problem with it.

Hmmm... so, that's a really ignorant thing to say, since you have literally no way of knowing my opinions or what they probably are.

Same with me, that's why we discuss, to make the other person see their error.

You're making an incorrect assumption about me as your premise.

We would both be of the opinion that the other person is illogical/making illogical statements.

Again a baseless assumption. It is not my opinion that you are using bad logic. It is an observable fact.

What you are saying is based on your opinion. So would my "insults" be.

Or, you know, my education and training in the formal use of logic and construction of arguments.

449

Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific

by LAWHFol in

i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.

i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.

"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.

Viviane

I wont bother showing you quotes where you expressed other opinions...

Oh no, not at all. If you are claiming that I have been saying anything else, then show it. Show your evidence. Put up or shut up. Man up.

This is a particular instance in which I very much want you to bother. Show your work.

Since you finally (In my opinion) understood this,

This is a perfect example of bullshit. Also a good example of how an opinion can be factually wrong.

Would you agree that since plants are atheists, body parts are atheist to?

Ramifications are conclusions or results. You asked a question. Poor use of wording and using words to mean something they don't, more evidence showing your accusations false. Thank you for playing.

(it's also another example of a class error in logic, since you mentioned posting examples of bad logic I thought I would help you out)

449

Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific

by LAWHFol in

i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.

i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.

"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.

Viviane

I could say the same for your illogical reasoning, but I don't bring it up at every opportunity as I consider it rude...
But if you want us sink to that level...

Well, first you'd have to show a single instance of that. Good luck in your quest.

449

Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific

by LAWHFol in

i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.

i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.

"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.

Viviane

Aberlour is delicious. Balvenie Doublewood is quite delicious.

And morpheus, I've no doubt of that.

449

Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific

by LAWHFol in

i have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.

i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.

"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.

Viviane

Hence, both are atheist.

Yeah, I've been saying that all along. Try and keep up.