so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Should we get involved in debates that pertain to unprovable facts?
What unprovable facts are you referring to?
Your last post seems to be a hodge podge mashup of vagaries completely unrelated to the topic, which, BTW, seems to be undefined at the moment.
To what imagined personal attacks do you refer? Is it an attack to state a fact? To mentioned observed behavior?
Why does the caged bird sing? If a wood chuck could chuck wood, how much wood would that wood chuck chuck?
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Friends:-Never mind about the insulting pictures, let's move on.
In space, one can hear you scream, but you still gotta poop.
Can you clarify what your current desire for the topic to be, since you seem to want to change it every time it's up to you to do some book learning?
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Welcome to reality
Exactly. Several people have gone, not one.
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
No one went to the moon.
That is 100% true.
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Recently, the past year, there were articles and news stories about some sort of force field (NOT the magnetic field), that circles Earth but goes out 8,000 miles which would supposedly protect from killer electrons.
*sigh*.... that's not what the article says.
Since the moon is beyond this, could lead credibility to it not have happening.
No, it does not. What leads to incredulity is a lack of basic science education and critical thinking skills
I do wonder how they so quickly were able to put man on the moon so long ago yet a year or 2 ago I read USA wanted to do it again but it would take at least 11 years. If we had already done it, why would it take so long to do it again?
Then, if you truly wonder, I would suggest you look into it. The answer is quite simple.
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Who cares? Believe what you want - except what the JWs are teaching.
Because this type of thinking is the same type of thinking that leads to anti-vaccination crusades. It's a symptom of a lack of critical thinking and reasoning skills, a demonstration of an inability to evaluate evidence and recognize reality. It hurts us all.
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Viviane: I've removed your images - they are not appreciated. If you don't want to discuss the topic then don't post on the thread.
Understood, although I have to confess at this point I am unclear what the topic is. Whether or not the moon landing happened is the topic of the thread, evidence was presented in favor of that man having landed on the moon. Counter-evidence was not presented because there is none.
Now the topic seems to be whatever Rebel doesn't doesn't bother to research about the moon, NASA, the space program, etc.
Rebel, would you mind clarifying what the topic is at this point?
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Thanks Viv, your images don't require answering a question, nor do they require deeper meaning, and therefore you can escape answering the puzzle of deeper meaning which my question challenged you . I do believe you can't answer my question.
Of course I can. I simply choose, again, to not do your research or critical thinking for you. That's become something of a theme on this thread of ever shifting topic. You ask an easily answered question, refuse to do even basic research, then complain when others won't do it for you, even after a kinder soul actually does the research for you and you don't bother to attempt to understand it.
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Why are you still feeding this attention seeking troll?
I ran out of books to read when I'm pooping, this fills the time.
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Rebel, you're intellectually lazy, willfully ignorant and have zero critical thinking skills.
RunForever, you're exactly the same same, just more overtly ignorant and uninformed with a side of pride in your ignorance. Rebel relishes his ignorance, but doesn't boast of it.
