Fishperson, I'll sum up your entire argument for you with two easy pictures, since you like them:
Viviane
JoinedPosts by Viviane
-
508
If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future
by DJS inscotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
-
-
-
508
If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future
by DJS inscotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
-
-
Viviane
No it does not. You have only posted a definition of the term you cut and pasted from the net.
Fishy, I posted a definition of the word. It shows you to be 100% wrong. Attempting to deny reality because "internet" means is not your friend, it simply means that every single thing you've ever posted can be called pointless and stupid because internet post also. All you've done is deny anything you've ever posted has validity and denied it in a pointless and brainless attempt to deny your own words to give yourself validity.
In other words, if you want to deny the definition, you must, by definition, call everything you've ever written useless, pointless rambling. I realize that is probably far beyond any thought you've ever had, so I won't be surprised when you don't get it. However, reality exists despite your lack of understanding, so either your words mean poop or your made an assertion that 100% contradicts observable reality.
The only question remaining is why you want to escape the consequences of your actions?
-
508
If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future
by DJS inscotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
-
-
Viviane
That is not an assertion.
It 100% is, giving you a 100% failure rate on anything you say matching reality.
noun1.a positive statement or declaration, often without support or reason:a mere assertion; an unwarranted assertion.2.Now that reality shows you 100% made an assertion and were 100% wrong, why do you think you should be exempt from the consequences of your actions?
-
508
If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future
by DJS inscotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
-
-
Viviane
When Kim Davis gets out of jail, I will personally go there and thank her.
Well, no one accused you of being smart with your time, so.... whatever.
-
508
If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future
by DJS inscotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
-
-
Viviane
Some day it may be legal for a man to marry a very young boy. It will not be considered illegal or child abuse.
What does that conjecture have to do with reality?
-
508
If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future
by DJS inscotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
-
-
Viviane
I have not asserted.
Here is a direct quote from you asserting that she is refusing to endorse gay marriage:
She refuses to endorse ss marriages.The Bible teaches that homosexual (ss) conduct is bad and also teaches tohate what is bad.
You absolutely did make that assertion, your denial of that fact is 100% untrue. Now that we have established the facts, why do you think you should escape the consequences of your actions?
-
508
If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future
by DJS inscotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
-
-
Viviane
Do not get angry with me viv, but that is an assertion.
It's an incorrect assertion, one you are making. Why do you feel you should escape the consequences of your actions?
-
508
If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future
by DJS inscotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
-
-
Viviane
They cannot force her to endorse gay marriages, but they can enforce a Court Order.
No one is asking her to endorse gay marriage. You are using the word "endorse" incorrectly.
-
508
If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future
by DJS inscotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
-
-
Viviane
I do not. When did religion push government to do their job and put gays in jail in the US for their "crimes?"
One case that comes to mind is when Focus on the Family, a right wing-nut religious group, filed an amicus brief in Lawrence v. Texas where sodomy was illegal, urging the Supreme Court to allow sodomy and homosexual behavior to be criminalized.
JW would never try to prevent gays from getting married or to have them jailed or executed.
Irrelevant.
It is a circuitous tactic to get her for contempt, but not for refusing to endorse gay marriages-they couldn't, so they used the catch-all device.
It's not circuitous at all. She is refusing to obey a lawful order of the court, something that she sought and swore to do as a condition of her job. Nor is she jailed for refusing to endorse gay marriage. Not one person is being asked to endorse gay marriage. She simply needs to, issue, sign and file marriage paperwork if properly submitted and executed. No endorsement is necessary, despite your attempts to pretend endorse means something it doesn't.
Honesty and education... you should try those. You would be wrong far less often.
-
508
If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future
by DJS inscotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
-
-
Viviane
Well, you're still wrong and uninformed and seem to have no plans to change either of those things. There is exactly zero point in talking to you as it's an absolute waste of time, energy and information.