while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
A simple yes, or no without snarky comebacks would be great, if you can do it.
Of course I can do whatever I want. I'm smart, sexy, make good money at my job and have awesome kids.
Whybin the wold anyone would expect me to answer a pedestrian pointless question born of misunderstanding is being me caring, however.
To wit, the type of answer you get is very dependant upon the quality of your question.
Oh, and one side DID win the argument. My side. The proper and correct side.
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
Mentioning that you are vaguely aware that women have sexy parts in pages of pages of posts about gay men only serves to illustrate how much more time you spend thinking about gay men and what they're up to, cheesypoof.
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
Apparently you care!
And now we know that you don't know what "apparently" or "care" means.
Here's a question, why do self-proclaimed straight white Bible misunderstanding men care more about what gays men's penises are up to than gay men do?
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
It is out of context, because it applied to the Nation (capitol N) of Israel
Since you're a stoneless cheesypoof not-follower-of-god that doesn't know what the Bible says, why should anyone care what your wrong about on the subject?
first of all; i must admit that i'm not a huge fan of putting people in boxes like this, it is not an exact science.
but i still think the data can be quite interesting and i intend to collect it and share it in a structured way with you guys.
so without future ado here are the details.. link to test: .
scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
And so are cheesypoof liberals
You just said you were ignorant of what cheesypoof means. Is it your intent to start telling us how you are constantly uninformed and wrong so I don't have to?
scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
I saw quite a quite few Huckabee for President bumper stickers today. I looked to see who the drivers were. They were religious jews dressed in their garb.
Plenty of Jews are morons. So what?
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
Sorry, your insults aren't working on me.
And now we know that you've no idea what the words insult, fact or reality mean.
I don't know what a cheesypoof is
I am in no way surprised that you don't know what you are.
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
only use the King James Bible! but no matter which translation you use, I am sure you will use it out of context.
In English, translated to mean "stoneless cheesypoof not follower of the Bible and, in actual fact, unaware of what it says Christian", of course.
