I don't think there is any proof that humans can comprehend or have the words to describe.
The any god you could potentially be describing is worthless and pointless.
Human science is worthless here.
Human science has made the world a far better place. You suggests a pointless god that is impotent to even show it exists. Science, in your scenario, is the useful thing. You've it backwards.
My point was that if you look at sociology and some of the biology there are too many coincidences to just write off something we don't understand.
You've yet to show me there is a god we don't understand. You're attempting to use science to prove science is worthless. That's not how it works.