To simply dismiss a claim as "irrelevant", would be (for the third time now) an argumentum ad lapidem. It would also be rude, and dishonest if a person knew what they were doing... Because, I dunno, someone had told them, more than once, in this very thread.
Jus' sayin'.
Just not saying much, then. Ample proof, ShortStuff, has been given. What's rude is not bothering to understand the argument before you jump and start saying ridiculous, irrelevant and pointless things as if you've any clue what's going on.
However, you are you about one single thing. You dunno and and appear to be not at all interested in fixing that.
Since the whole of the rest of your post is born is error, I'm not bothering with it, Shorty.