a few weeks ago, discoveries were made that show that there is another dna code language that rides on top of the already incredibly complex 4-letter code previously discovered.
this newly discovered code apparently regulates how genes work.
as i noted in a previous thread, the amount of data storage available in the dna storage system just the size of a pin-head would filll a stack of books stacked from your driveway to the moon .... 500 times!
Should it not read "who made the god"?. All you theists , deists , close your eyes for 2 minutes picture your god, picture his realm of existence , picture his immediate surroundings, who is close to him/her . What exactly do you see in your minds eye..............????????
Did you picture ANYTHING not human like, or not an exaggerated human form , or human landscape?....EXACTLY everything you saw if you are honest!! was man creating god not vice versa. Do not delude yourselves
is it true that the march ministry is hinting that this year will be the last memorial, someone just said that today in the service, just wanted to confirm.. .
.
edit: forgot to add the month..
Its all about the implication of the question ie is it because the big "A" is imminent shudder shriek quake with fear or hooray as the case may be or just to boost attendance at theNON event . Whatever the reason you can bet its manipulative.
this is taken from the bbc's sunday morning show 'the big questions'.
i was going to pick out a few highlights but really, you need to watch the whole thing - it's only 23 minutes.
seriously, i could feel the bile and frustration rising in my gullet .
Cofty I concur.
this is taken from the bbc's sunday morning show 'the big questions'.
i was going to pick out a few highlights but really, you need to watch the whole thing - it's only 23 minutes.
seriously, i could feel the bile and frustration rising in my gullet .
Julia that then implies you would not allow a scientific opinion in a religious forum, haven't they both been opinionated on for centuries , otherwise the discussion would be dogma or bias.
this is taken from the bbc's sunday morning show 'the big questions'.
i was going to pick out a few highlights but really, you need to watch the whole thing - it's only 23 minutes.
seriously, i could feel the bile and frustration rising in my gullet .
Phizzy exactly thats why it should only be included in a educational establishment class or forum as an opinion NEVER fact
this is taken from the bbc's sunday morning show 'the big questions'.
i was going to pick out a few highlights but really, you need to watch the whole thing - it's only 23 minutes.
seriously, i could feel the bile and frustration rising in my gullet .
Nugget, you can't write any paper on a subject without listening to or understanding opinion. Isn't that what education is based on ie how can you be educated without listening to opinion??
this is taken from the bbc's sunday morning show 'the big questions'.
i was going to pick out a few highlights but really, you need to watch the whole thing - it's only 23 minutes.
seriously, i could feel the bile and frustration rising in my gullet .
Cant leave you are correct, but you don't have to write a paper on the subject to discuss or reason on it no matter how credible it is.
P off logic:philosophy of reasoning each of the example subjects you mention can easily be disscused together with the aid of logic : philosophy of reasoning.The context in which they are discussed is surely up to the participants to decide .No one should dictate because of a reason of bias the exclusion of a related subject no matter how remote the connection is Please remember the examples quoted are not mine
this is taken from the bbc's sunday morning show 'the big questions'.
i was going to pick out a few highlights but really, you need to watch the whole thing - it's only 23 minutes.
seriously, i could feel the bile and frustration rising in my gullet .
My understanding is that creationism is the study or search if you like of what brought us into being quite simple really.
Nugget are physicists not scientists, they have been pondering and arguing about creationism for years ie the process or cause of why everything has been brought into being hence created hence creationism. By the way god adam eve etc have nothing to do with it but i have definately heard scientists discuss the religious reasoning on it or would you rather they didn't?
this is taken from the bbc's sunday morning show 'the big questions'.
i was going to pick out a few highlights but really, you need to watch the whole thing - it's only 23 minutes.
seriously, i could feel the bile and frustration rising in my gullet .
Because the belief in a flat earth is scientificaly proven to be false .Belief in creationism is believing that all that exists today had to have been brought into being by some process whatever that process was, is what created all we have today. The definition of create is : bring into being, you cant argue you have not been brought into being can you? The education aspect of the WHYs and WHEREFOREs of the subject should not exclude any theories. Again i say lies should NOT be taught as fact.
this is taken from the bbc's sunday morning show 'the big questions'.
i was going to pick out a few highlights but really, you need to watch the whole thing - it's only 23 minutes.
seriously, i could feel the bile and frustration rising in my gullet .
Simply because they are not equivalent ,unless you disagree .Can you cite any examples or reasons why you would think so?
