West
You really need to do more research before you post things like
Rutherford was practically everyone's choice as successor to the WatchTower Society throne. Rutherford received 93-4% of the votes (without Russell's personal shares being voted as Russellites allege). At the January BOD meeting, the BOD voted to vest all administrative powers in Rutherford's hands.
The book The Four Presidents of the Watch Tower Society stateson page 26:
In 1917, just a few months after Russell's death, the political Rutherford had already formed an alliance to project him into the presidency. The key was A. H. Macmillan--not only the man Russell generally left in charge as presidential assistant when he traveled away from Brooklyn, but also who himself had a large percentage of proxy votes. Using Macmillan to convince Treasurer Willaim E. Van Amburgh, who probably held the second highest number of proxy votes, Rutherford was ready for the election on Jan 6, 1917.
On a nominating motion from one associate (A. N. Pierson), another one seconding the motion, the door to nominations was quickly closed by Macmillan, who was immediately instructed to make Rutherford's election unanimous. (7) It was done, and the word went out throughout the land that Rutherford was elected by unanimous vote. (8) Those sitting with proxies to be cast for others never got the chance. (9) No one dared oppose the Judge.
A hard, cold, arrogant man who ridiculed common courtesy and kindness, he quickly realized that the membership would never accept him as another Pastor Russell. He also realized they were ripe for the taking.
Using legal maneuvers, he [Rutherford] managed to remove four directors who were resisting his attempts to control the Society's assets, and appointed four supporters to join his three friendly directors. The four ousted directors chose not to fight Rutherford in the courts.(10)
The endnotes for these comments state:
(7) Macmillan used to joke about the maneuver. He was so popular among those holding the proxies that they went along with "Brother Mac".
(8) Unfortunately, even some credible critiques of the Watch Tower Society make the statement that his 1917 election was unanimous, suggesting voter support, without offering explanation.
(9) According to Macmillan, he had enough proxies, along with those held by treasurer William Van Ambergh, to win the position, but he was an ardent supporter of Rutherford as was Van Ambergh. Van Ambergh considered Rutherford as "the only one who can crack the whip around here." Macmillan cared little for top management considering himself a "field man."
(10) Rutherford said they were elected in Pennsylvania and therefore had no voice in the New York corporation, and literally put them out on the street. Legal consultants say his position was weak, and had the ousted directors pursued the matter legally, Rutherford would have lost. This was comfirmed by Hayden Covington, noted Watch Tower lawyer. p 208