If the WTS were to say it was just a religious issue that would be one thing, but in their haste to promote the potential medical benefits of refusing blood they have misrepresented facts. Anyone who parrots those facts is doing so at their own risk. AuldSoul
See it from a Judge's point of view. If a mundane mechanic, hair-dresser or bus driver "parrots" this blood story, would you comply? Anyone can express an opinion about medical care, but only your qualified medical doctor (a physician) can be held acountable for wrong information and/or treatment.
The day some of us decided to give our lives -and thinking- away to a religious cult, that day we became accountable for the deadly medical procedures we accepted from those unqualifed people.
My 2 cents...