Marijuana

by gumby 23 Replies latest jw friends

  • gumby
    gumby

    health risk myths & realities
    Marijuana Overdose
    There is no existing evidence of anyone dying of a marijuana overdose. Tests performed on mice have shown that the ratio of cannabinoids (the chemicals in marijuana that make you high) necessary for overdose to the amount necessary for intoxication is 40,000:1.

    For comparison's sake, that ratio for alcohol is generally between 4:1 and 10:1. Alcohol overdoses claim approximately 5,000 casualties yearly, but marijuana overdoses kill no one as far as any official reports.

    Brain Damage
    Marijuana is psychoactive because it stimulates certain brain receptors, but it does not produce toxins that kill them (like alcohol), and it does not wear them out as other drugs may. There is no evidence that marijuana use causes brain damage. Studies performed on actual human populations will confirm these results, even for chronic marijuana users (up to 18 joints per day) after many years of use.

    In fact, following the publication of two 1977 JAMA studies, the American Medical Association (AMA) officially announced its support for the decriminalization of marijuana.

    In reality, marijuana has the effect of slightly increasing alpha-wave activity in your brain. Alpha waves are generally associated with meditative and relaxed states, which are, in turn, often associated with human creativity.

    Memory
    Marijuana does impair short-term memory, but only during intoxication. Although the authoritative studies on marijuana use seem to agree that there is no residual impairment following intoxication, persistent impairment of short-term memory has been noted in chronic marijuana smokers, up to 6 and 12 weeks following abstinence.

    Heart Problems It is accepted in medical circles today that marijuana use causes no evident long-term cardiovascular problems for normal persons. Marijuana smoking, however, does cause changes in the heart and body's circulation characteristic of stress, which may complicate preexisting cardiovascular problems like hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and coronary atherosclerosis. Marijuana's effects on blood pressure are complex and inconsistent as of yet.

    Hormones
    Chronic marijuana use has not been found to alter testosterone or other sex hormone levels. In contrast, heavy alcohol use is known to lower these same testosterone levels.

    Reproductive Damage
    No trustworthy study has ever shown that marijuana use damages the reproductive system, or causes chromosome breakage. Studies of actual human populations have failed to demonstrate that marijuana adversely affects the reproductive system. Claims that marijuana use may impair hormone production, menstrual cycles, or fertility in females are both unproven and unfounded.

    The Immune System
    Studies in which lab rats were injected with extremely large quantities of THC (the active compound in marijuana) have found that marijuana (in such unrealistically huge quantities) does have an "immunosuppressive effect" in those lab rats, in that it temporarily shuts off certain cells in the liver called lymphocytes and macrophages. These macrophages are useful in fighting off bacterial, not viral, infections.

    But this is only for the duration of intoxication. There also exists some evidence that marijuana metabolites remain in the lungs for up to seven months after smoking has ceased, possibly affecting the immune system of the lungs (but not by turning the cells off).

    This said, doctors and researchers are still not sure that the immune system is actually negatively affected in realistic situations since there are no numbers to support the idea. In fact, three studies showed that THC might have actually stimulated the immune system in the people studied.

    Cancer
    Smoking marijuana has the potential to cause both bronchitis and cancer of the lungs, throat, and neck, but this is generally no different than inhaling any other burnt carbon-containing matter since they all increase the number of lesions (and therefore possible infections) in your airways.

    The Gateway Effect
    Marijuana use has not been found to act as a gateway drug to the use of harder drugs. Studies show that when the Dutch partially legalized marijuana in the 70's, heroin and cocaine use substantially declined, despite a slight increase in marijuana use.

    If the stepping stone theory were true, use should have gone up rather than down. In reality, it appears that marijuana use tends to substitute for the use of relatively more dangerous hard drugs like cocaine and heroin, rather than lead to their use.

    Thus, oftentimes strict marijuana laws themselves are the most significant factor involved in moving on to harder drugs like cocaine. Such is the case in Nevada and Arizona, the states toughest on marijuana use.

    the potential benefits

  • Because smoked marijuana contains a variety of combustion compounds, it can damage the lungs and possibly the immune system. Several health committees recommended the development of an inhalation device that delivers pure THC -- the active ingredient in marijuana -- to the lungs. Such a device has not yet been created.

  • There is some evidence -- but no scientifically valid studies -- that marijuana is useful in treating some forms of epilepsy and spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis.

  • Some studies show that smoked marijuana is effective for some patients in relieving nausea caused by cancer and chemotherapy.

  • There is evidence that marijuana may improve the appetite and help patients gain weight. This could be lifesaving for AIDS patients who develop wasting , a severe weight-loss condition.

  • Smoking marijuana is effective in lowering pressure inside the eyeballs of some patients with glaucoma. A word of caution, however: the drug also drops blood pressure, and this could compromise blood flow to the optic nerve and damage vision
  • Gumbonger

  • MsMcDucket
    MsMcDucket

    Here in Kansas they do give patients without appetites or who have nausea (not relieved by other means) Dronabinol or Marinol. It's supposed to increase their appetites...ie give them the munchies. I don't know how it works on stopping the nausea.

  • skyman
    skyman

    Yummy, yummy, yummy............, put pot in our tummy, .............then we feel like we need something to eat.

  • gumby
    gumby
    I don't know how it works on stopping the nausea.

    Mrs Duckett,

    I have a good friend who is an ex-dub who had gastrinal peresis ( stomach problems). He said the only thing that takes away his nauciousnes( sick feeling...can't spell)...is to smoke weed. It also makes him eat. Cancer patients are perscribed marijuana to overcome sickness from Chemo.

    Gumby

  • drew sagan
    drew sagan

    Legalize it, Man!

  • gumby
    gumby
    Legalize it, Man!

    It's getting there. Rhode Island just became another state to legalize it. In the early 1900's till about the 40's...it was viewed as a miracle plant and farmers were required to grow it in some states. The government wasn't getting their cut from black market dealers so they blackballed it and demonized it.........but it's having a comeback. Gumby

  • Elsewhere
    Elsewhere

    I saaaay weee all gooo maaarch on zzzZZZZzzzZZzzzzzzzz

  • Gretchen956
    Gretchen956
    Can a JW use marijuana in this manner and not get df'd?

    My sister-in-law has MS. She smokes it and her hubby (my brother) is an elder. I'm not "allowed" in their hallowed company so I can't tell you how quiet she keeps it or where she gets it. It always made me wonder, though!

    Sherry

  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    I am all for some Delta-9 - tetrahydrocannibol

  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    Lord Victor Adebowale, director of the drug treatment charity Turning Point and member of the Advisory Council on Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), said: "I am increasingly concerned about the politicisation of this - the playing to the gallery." He said it would be "very serious" for the home secretary to ignore the council's advice. "This wasn't a group of long-haired ex-cannabis smokers. These are some of the best pharmacologists in the country with worldwide reputations," he said. "He's basically saying he's got no confidence in their opinion."

    In recommending that the drug remain at class C, the report says: "The council does not advise that the classification of cannabis-containing products should be changed on the basis of the result of recent research into the effects on the development of psychoses. Although it is unquestionably harmful, its harmfulness does not equate to that of other class B substances both at the level of the individual or society." It recommends maintaining the status quo for three reasons: the risk of developing mental illness from smoking cannabis is very small; the harm caused by the drug is substantially less than other class B substances, such as amphetamines; and reclassification has not resulted in an increase in use by adolescents and young adults.

    Last week, Mr Clarke hinted that he was considering a U-turn. "The thing that worries me most [about the downgrading of cannabis] is confusion among the punters about what the legal status of cannabis is," he told the Times. "I'm very struck by the advocacy of a number of people who have been proposers of the reclassification of cannabis that they were wrong." Leslie King, a member of the ACMD's technical committee and former head of the Forensic Science Service's drugs intelligence unit, said that if the home secretary ignored the panel's advice, it would have "considerable ramifications" for the ACMD's credibility. Professor Leslie Iversen, a pharmacologist at Oxford University and ACMD member, said that if Mr Clarke ignored the committee's advice it would set an "unfortunate precedent".

    Asked whether council members might consider resigning he said: "I can't speak for my colleagues, but I would think quite carefully about whether it is worth devoting a lot of effort and time to this type of exercise if your advice is going to be ignored." Another ACMD member, Martin Barnes, chief executive of Drugscope, agreed that resignations might follow. "Our view is that if the government chooses not to follow the advisory council's recommendation they've got to really have pretty compelling reasons not to."

  • Share this

    Google+
    Pinterest
    Reddit