the Witnesses claimed that the Canadian “defendant’s main purpose [was] not fair use but rather to try to embarrass [them]…[and is] likely to cause confusion.”
Ya, no shit Sherlock......imagine being "confused" when you realize that your family member died needlessly at the hands of "Mother" who claims she got her instructions directly from Father. Years later you find out Father never said such a thing in the first place. Geeze, I can't see how this would cause confusion.....or resentment........