Hello everyone,
I have followed the latest news
on this thread and I wish to make some comments.
Messenger : Thanks for posting the quotes and for the
information about DPI material and the Awake !
The quotes are a good reference.
Bluesapphire : I do like the way you have written your thoughts.
Nice line of reasoning. I’m wondering what will happen next !
Belbab : a good point about Afghanistan. Everybosy knows that
clandestine proselitism is a very hot issue in many countries.
That includes smuggling « religious literature « taking advantage
of some organisation...United Nations !
Tanalyst : True. the Internet is exposing everyday, in various part
of the world the...hidden face of the WTBS and their tactics so that
many that were in complete darkness now...THEY KNOW and as
the phrase goes : « The truth will set you FREE ... »
Dbeetle : great information about the YMCA, including the words
that I personally didn’t know. The informations about YMCA
are more relevant to the USA, where it enjoys a great popularity.
Nelly 136 : Powerfull logical reasoning ! Thanks for the quotes.
Bj : w 15.4.96 p.12-13 §§ 6-10 - Here they are ...the pages in
English...
*** w96 4/15 12-13 Why Worldly Religion Will End ***
False Religion Indicted
6 Although millions in Christendom regularly use the Lord’s Prayer, in which they pray for God’s Kingdom to come, they have assiduously supported every form of political expression, to the exclusion of that theocratic rule. Centuries ago “princes” of the Catholic Church, such as Cardinals Richelieu, Mazarin, and Wolsey, acted also as secular statesmen, ministers of government.
7 More than 50 years ago, in the booklet entitled Religion Reaps the Whirlwind, Jehovah’s Witnesses exposed Christendom’s involvement with politics. What was said then applies with equal force today: “Honest investigation of the conduct of the religious clergy of all denominations will reveal that the religious leaders of all ‘Christendom’ are participating with keen interest in the politics of ‘this present evil world’ and are dabbling in its mundane affairs.” Back then the Witnesses castigated Pope Pius XII for his concordats with Nazi Hitler (1933) and Fascist Franco (1941), as well as for the pope’s exchange of diplomatic representatives with the aggressor nation Japan in March 1942, just a few months after the infamous Pearl Harbor attack. The pope failed to heed James’ warning: “Adulteresses, do you not know that the friendship with the world is enmity with God? Whoever, therefore, wants to be a friend of the world is constituting himself an enemy of God.”—James 4:4.
8 What is the situation today? The papacy is still involved in politics, both through its clergy and through its laity representatives. Recent popes have put their stamp of approval on the United Nations by addressing that man-made counterfeit for world peace. A recent issue of L’Osservatore Romano, the official Vatican newspaper, announced that seven new diplomats, “ambassadors to the Holy See,” presented their credentials to the “Holy Father.” Could we imagine Jesus and Peter being involved in such diplomatic exchanges? Jesus refused to be made king by the Jews and said that his Kingdom was not of this world.—John 6:15; 18:36.
9 Are Protestant leaders any better than their Catholic counterparts? In the United States, many conservative Protestant religions, and Mormons as well, are identified with a certain political orientation. The Christian Coalition is deeply involved in U.S. politics. Other Protestant clergy clearly identify with a different political stance. It is sometimes forgotten that in the United States, political spokesmen such as Pat Robertson and Jesse Jackson are or were also “Reverends,” as is British member of Parliament Ian Paisley of Northern Ireland. How do they ever justify their positions?—Acts 10:34, 35; Galatians 2:6.
10 As Religion Reaps the Whirlwind asked in 1944, so do we now: “Can any organization that enters into treaties with worldly powers and actively wiggles itself into the political affairs of this world, seeking advantage in and protection from this world . . . be God’s church or represent Christ Jesus on earth? . . . Manifestly, all religionists who make common cause with the kingdoms of this world cannot represent the kingdom of God by Christ Jesus.”
Excellent research and ....powerfull quote!!!
Hawkaw: Thanks for your excellent comments. In particular
that one about the UN ‘s CHARTER and the WTBS literature.
Thanks for the links...will browse them.
Map: Thanks fot the quote - w 1.10.95 p.4
Here copied for everyone:
*** w95 10/1 4-5 Fifty Years of Frustrated Efforts ***
The Media’s Influence
As powerful as the United Nations may appear to be, its efforts are often thwarted by politics and the media. The United Nations is powerless if it lacks the support of its members. But without the public’s approval, many UN members will not support the United Nations.
For instance, according to The Wall Street Journal, the “spectacular failures in Somalia and Bosnia have persuaded many Americans that the organization isn’t just wasteful, but actually dangerous.” This attitude of the public has, in turn, persuaded some American politicians to propose reducing U.S. financial support of the United Nations.
News organizations are not shy when it comes to criticizing the United Nations severely. Terms like “total incompetence,” “cumbersome,” “inefficient,” and “paralyzed” have been unreservedly used when describing various aspects of UN operations. The Washington Post National Weekly Edition recently stated that “the United Nations remains a slow-motion bureaucracy struggling to adapt to a real-time world.”
Another newspaper quoted Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali as expressing his frustration with the Rwanda massacres. He said: “It is a failure not only for the United Nations; it is a failure for the international community. And all of us are responsible for this failure.” A popular television news-special in 1993 stated that the United Nations “has failed to stop the greatest threat to peace—the spread of nuclear weapons.” The TV program spoke of a United Nations that “for decades has been mostly talk.”
This widespread feeling of disappointment weighs heavily on the minds of United Nations officials and adds to their frustration. Yet, despite the frustrations, at the 50th anniversary of the United Nations, many seem to have renewed optimism and are hoping for a fresh start. Although acknowledging the shortcomings of the United Nations, Ambassador Albright echoed the sentiments of many when she said: “We have to stop talking about where we’ve been, and we need to talk about where we’re going.”
Yes, where is the world going? Will there ever be a world without war? If so, what role will the United Nations play in it? Moreover, if you are God-fearing, you should ask, ‘What role will God play in it?’
[Box on page 4]
FRUSTRATED EFFORTS
Peace and security cannot exist as long as there are war, poverty, crime, and corruption. The United Nations recently released the following statistics.
Wars: “Of the 82 armed conflicts between 1989 and 1992, 79 were domestic, many along ethnic lines; 90 per cent of casualties were civilian.”—United Nations Department of Public Information (UNDPI)
Weapons: “The ICRC [International Committee of the Red Cross] estimates more than 95 manufacturers in 48 countries are producing between 5 and 10 million anti-personnel mines each year.”—United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
“In Africa, there are about 30 million mines scattered over 18 countries.”—UNHCR
Poverty: “Worldwide, one out of every five people—more than one billion in all—live below the poverty line, and an estimated 13 million to 18 million die annually of poverty-related causes.”—UNDPI
Crime: “Reported crime has grown at a world-wide average of 5 per cent each year since the 1980s; in the USA alone, there are 35 million crimes committed annually.”—UNDPI
Corruption: “Public corruption is becoming commonplace. In some countries financial frauds are estimated to cost the equivalent of 10 per cent of the country’s annual gross domestic product.”—UNDPI
°°°°Right on the mark !!!
Truth 1 : good suggestion “ break the news gradually “..
I think it will avoid unnecessary conflicts and straine relationships.
Trevor Scott: Thanks for the comment. I’m quite sure – cannot
say certain – that the WTBS “ internet watchers “ are reading with
great attention all the threads of this Forum, ...and others.
This one about the NGO’s must be quite at the top of their
viewing list!! Btw, I have “heard “ that after every two hours
of watching the “Internet “ the - watchers – do take a break!!!
(I don’t know if it is true ...but ...!)
Thanks again to all of you for the collaboration , your time and
efforts, greeting, J.C.MacHislopp
" One who has an accurate knowledge
of God's Word will have no problem
in refuting false religious ideas".