WT 5/1/06 -Backing Away from 1914? - NO

Darth Yhwh

Hey Leolaila, I think the graphs are great. A picture (or graph) is worth a thousand words. Your graphs certainly show a decline in emphasis on 1914 and 607 both. Excellent work.
moggy lover

Re the graphs, Leolaia:
There is obviously a decline in the importance of 607 BC I mean they are still prattling on about the "time of the end" and all that but no 607 BC to back them up.
Can it possibly be that they actually may drop that date? Seeing that it is becoming harder to sustain in the light of the information from forums such as ours?
But then they will be stuffed for "explaining" the Gentile Times!!
Super Presentation, by the way.
Cheers
Neo

Leo,
Check an old post of mine on the topic at hand: http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/12/76237/1230290/post.ashx#1230290
BTW: the downward trend for 607 is super-obvious. Although they still mention the date, they seem to feel embarassed doing so. They are definetely not emphasizing it as they used to.
Neo
Leolaia

Kewl, Neo, great minds think alike!