Eduardo,
It is also interesting that Hassan EXPLICITLY mentions the JW in his second book, Releasing the Bonds.
The thing about cults is they are all different in HOW they apply Lifton, and the degree of control they attempt to have over their members.
I would submit that there is a direct correlation to how anti-social and destructive a cults doctrine is to how much control they need to have over their members. The kookier and more dangerous, the more controlling they have to be.
I would also submit that there is a direct correlation to how much control a group attempts to acquire and how large of a group they end up being. More controlling, the smaller the group.
Nobody doubts that there are some groups that are less controlling and abusive than the JW. That is hardly a ringing endorsement by the way. The fact of the matter is when people attempt to control people, you will almost always end up having an abusive situation.
Abuse means one person attempts to disrupt the other person's confidence in their own ability to judge and respond to reality. I think it would be hard to read Hassan's description of mind control Combatting and not seeing a direct correlation to methods used by the wt. I guess one would HAVE to be willing to see such correlations.
"Men often stumble upon the truth, and the quickly pick themselves up and hurry on as if nothing happened" -Winston Churchill
So the question is why does the "truth" need to be maintained and protected by methods of unethical influence commonly used by bizarre cults, and even abusive mates? I always thought the only thing needed for the truth to flourish was for it's quality to be shown in the free and open exchange of ideas. I thought only lies had to be maintained by domination, claims of authority, and ad hominem attacks on those who disagree.
Or maybe the question is why do some refuse to recognize or wish to minimize the reality of the unethical influence used by the wt?
CYP