Firearms And Shooting...

by Justice-One 159 Replies latest social physical

  • asleif_dufansdottir
    asleif_dufansdottir

    I certainly may have misinterpreted the comment, but let me tell you, you can't believe the things people accuse me of just because I'm a gun owner.

    To answer your question, I do not consider myself a pacifist. I would certainly fight back any way I could to protect my family. The thing I am afraid of though, is overreacting and perhaps taking it a step too far. Sometimes I get angry at people and don't like how it makes me feel, and in those situations, having a weapon on me might lead me to make a very rash decision.

    This is why education is so important. Especially shoot/don't shoot scenarios. In fact, I did quite a bit of research before deciding which of the several places nearby to take firearms classes. The range at which I take places has an interactive, computer generated video simulation training room. There are several scenarios...several of which you should not shoot in. The system also tracks whether your shots were hits or misses, and whether they would take the assailant out of the fight. The first time I used it, several people in my class took shots and missed. The instructor said, "your shot just went through the wall and hit a neighbor's child." Trust me, it makes you much more careful about your reaction.

    I like this place. Law enforcement officers from across the state and surrounding states take training there. I'm lucky I'm so close. But good training is absolutely necessary if you are going to take the responsibility to carry a weapon.

  • catbert
    catbert

    asleif_dufansdottir,



  • asleif_dufansdottir
    asleif_dufansdottir
    I agree with you 100%. But I ask you this: if a perp breaks into your house and steals your gun and kills someone with it, what should your level of responsibility be?

    You mean once he's yanked the safe from the house (it's secured down), taken it somewhere, broken into it, and got the guns? I'll be really, really mad.

    And my level of responsibility would be the same as if he'd stolen my car and run over somebody with it.

    Why should I not have something...anything, just because some criminal might steal it and hurt someone in the process? Why is it more my responsibility than the criminals? Why are we holding law-abiding citizens responsible for the actions of criminals??

  • catbert
    catbert

    asleif_dufansdottir,

    Your guns are no more locked up 100% of the time than mine are!
    What good is a gun in a safe! Fess up man!

  • asleif_dufansdottir
    asleif_dufansdottir

    Shoot, I wish we could edit posts.

    I have no sympathy for irresponsible gun owners. They are, of course, out there. There are also irresponsible parents, irresponsible drivers (who kill people) and irresponsible pet owners (people have been killed by people's pets running loose).

    If somebody leaves a loaded gun lying around where their child or someone else's child can get ahold of it, they're beyond irresponsible. If somebody leaves a gun (loaded or not) unsecured and someone breaks in and steals it, well, I'll think they were pretty dumb. I wouldn't necessarily hold them responsible for being a victim of a crime. I believe if you're going to take the responsibility of being a gun owner you should have some way of securing the weapon when it's not on your person.

  • asleif_dufansdottir
    asleif_dufansdottir

    When I'm not home, if they're not with me, they're locked up.

    If you're talking about a home invasion (somebody breaks in and tries to steal the gun when I'm there), well, they can try. They might succeed. I'm not going to choose not to own a gun just because somebody might break into my house while I'm there and take it from me.

  • catbert
    catbert

    asleif_dufansdottir,

    But we do not secure our weapons all the time do we?
    Again, what good is a gun locked up in a safe?

  • catbert
    catbert

    asleif_dufansdottir,

    One of the most sought after items for criminals are guns. Many crimes are committed with stolen guns. We have many stolen guns in circulation in the USA. Its a big problem.

  • asleif_dufansdottir
    asleif_dufansdottir

    I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. If I'm home, I have a loaded gun on me (if I'm carrying that day) or very close by.

    I realize that this makes me sound like a paranoid nutjob. I'm really not, honest. It's just easier to keep the gun in the holster and on my belt if I'm going to carry at all that day than to run back and forth from the safe. Especially if the dog has to go on an 'emergency potty walk'. There have been several attacks against women in the area and I rarely go out without some form of self defense. And, if I'm not carrying, I keep it close by to make sure that I know where it is at all times (to make sure I don't do something like forget to lock it up if I leave without it). I want it where I can keep an eye on it.

    I doubt very much some bad guy is going to try to break down my door (especially after they hear the German Shepherd mix barking (she sounds very impressive). I don't have her for "defense purposes" either, in case you're wondering...she's my buddy. But, to make sure the gun is always safe, (and because it's a pain to load and unload and put in and take out of the safe it all the time) I want it close by.

  • catbert
    catbert

    asleif_dufansdottir,

    Well, you are unique. Most "paranoid nutjobs" have guns stashed around the house in various places. They should take your advice and have one gun in a holster on their belt. That would be safer. Having a gun in a holster on your belt makes visitors nervous though, but they get used to it. They tend not to start religious or political arguments!

    I think what you also need to understand is that there are a lot of "closet nutjobs" in the USA that have guns legally, and they may just come out of the closet someday! That tends to get messy.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit