Rebel, I'm glad you questioned some of the comments, including mine. I am normally very cautious about what I say, so, I may not have been as clear as I meant to be.
#1. To crazyblonde: I have always enjoyed your posts and very much respect you. I did not know (or remember) until Rebel pointed it out that you've been very open about your abuse and posting it here.
Since I did not know, maybe I should have investigated. I was not calling you a liar. The people there...well, they are required to assume you lied, because, the real truth is a grave danger to their Truthâ„¢.
Rebel8Forgive me if I'm missing some details or if I'm flat out wrong.
I was surprised by the replies on this thread, so I went to the other forum and read through the posts there too....and I don't get why the OP is being called a fraud or liar, here or there.
On this forum, she has spoken of her experiences as a molestation victim for over a year. You can find that by reviewing her topic history. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the posts here that seem to say she is lying about that.
I don't understand the comments about feeding the jw paranoia complex.....isn't e-watchman a forum critical of the wts?
*I don't know why it formatted like that...?
"Feeding the jw paranoia..." Skally already explained about the 'site' confusion. For me, crazyblonde had a very noble purpose in mind... to bring attention to faithful jw's what we all know is a horrible secret among jw's -- how their faith in the GB encourages and protects pedophiles in the congregation.
However, when she said, "Anyone else for some fun?", "Lets have some fun for a minute" she took credibility away from her message. They (and their jw paranoia) jumped on that like they are trained to do.
It's a simple mistake, imo, but, something I think should be pointed out for the next time we try to reason with jw's. We know how they think...we were them at one time.
~ Cold chill down my spine ~
Sincerely, Rabbit (hoping I did not hurt anyone's feelings)