I've just been reading an email that an ex jw sent to dedpoet recently, and he raised an interesting point, so I though I'd post it (dp emailed him back, and he gave permission). Anyway, this is what he had to say:
Hi Trevor
I came across your website recently, and as an ex Witness living in North Derbyshire, I thought I'd share a few thoughts I had recently with you.
Like yourself, I joined the Jehovahs Witnesses in the early 90's, being baptised in 1992 at the District Convention (the same one as dp). I begab studying with the Witnesses in 1991, using the You Can Live Forever in Paradise On Earth book. I wasn't raised a witness, starting my study at the age pf 27 and being baptised just after my 29th birtday. I made some progress, making MS by 1996, but doubts started to rise after a few incidents I won't go into, and I stopped attending in 2003, and was disfellowshipped in 2004 because I had started attending another Church, which I still attend.
My point is, I know the Witnesses call it a Bible Study, but was it really that? Looking back, I remember the Live Forever book containing a lot of information, with the odd scripture cited, and explained by the material in the book. A lot of the scriptures seemed somewhat out of context, and were from the NWT, as dishonest and distorted translation as I have ever read. I imagine that, like me, you were encouraged to use the NWT rather than any other bible from early in the study, and your conductor soon had you reading the paragraphs out loud, a practice I found made them easier to remember.
My idea of a Bible Study, pre - Witness, would have been to read a portion of scripture and try to understand it, maybe in company with others. That's what we do at the Church I attend now, but it's very far removed from the Witnesses idea of a study, which is why I question their use of the term. As an indoctrination tool, studying their publications the way they do is second to none, but they aren't really studying the bible. They are merely using whatever book they currently use on interested ones to indoctrinate them with Watchtower interpretations. I don't know if bible studies are covered by the Trade Descriptions Act, I doubt they are, but if they were I suspect the Witnesses would be breaching it with what they class as a bible study.
So, what do you think? I would be interested to hear from you, and, if I may, contribute to your website.
Cheers
Ken
I hadn't really thought about this before, and neither had dedpoet, but he may have a point, what do you all think/
Linda