Is a "Pure" religion an oxymoron?

by free2beme 15 Replies latest jw friends

  • free2beme
    free2beme

    It seems that everyone I know who claims to be in the right religion, has the idea that their religion is some how more pure or perfect then all others. Whether is a Christian faith as a whole, or an individual sect of Christianity. They are holding a lot of faith in thinking that what they are in, somehow worked itself throughout our ever changing history to become a product today that is nearly exact to what it was like when it began in ancient times. Yet in history, so many things we accept as normal today, have changed drastically from their origin to today. For a couple of example, look at our language. Whether you speak English, French, German or any other language out there. These are passed on phrases and words that have changed so much, that if you spoke English to someone in the year 1000 who claimed to be speaking English, as well, you would have as difficult of a time at understanding them, as you would today with someone speaking Italian to your English. Our way of writing has also changed, with rules of language changing and certain phrases and words evolving and growing. So with these two examples in mind, why would we not think that religion would have also changed from it's origin. Christianity, is not very hard to study and learn that it is not a religion of religious development through some divine inspiration, but more of a political product of agreements and disagreements that lead to control of the masses.

    Today, Websters dictionary still edits itself each year to add words, and change definitions as our language develops. We are continuing to see our communication grow and develop, to the point that we can even get confused in our own lifetime with how someone may speak our language in one time to another (just ask your grandparents). Yet, no one seems to be willing to see that their religion, has, does and will do the same. Religion can not be pure, anymore more so then anything that has passed itself down through history, can be. We are a species of continued development and growth. We add, delete and develop new ways of doing everything. Including how we worship a higher power. So if anyone, including our former church, says they are in a pure religion. They are not aware of what an oxymoron that phrase really is.

  • Arthur
    Arthur

    Good topic, free2beme.

    This topic reminds me of a great book that I read not too long ago by a guy named Sam Harris. The title of his book is "The End of Faith - Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason". It is a great read. I don't agree with everything in the book, but I recommend it to anyone.

    Here is a good quote from his book. Harris writes:

    "The idea that any one of our religions represents the infallible word of the One True God requires an encyclopedic ignorance of history, mythology, and art even to be entertained - as the beliefs, rituals, and iconography of each of our religions attest to centuries of cross-pollination among them. Whatever their imagined source, the doctrines of modern religions are no more tenable than those which, for lack of adherents, were cast upon the scrap heap of mythology millenia ago."

  • parakeet
    parakeet

    Yes, and it always was.

  • fullofdoubtnow
    fullofdoubtnow

    Yes it is. I don't know if there ever was a pure religion, but if there was it was corrupted long ago. Nowadays, phrases like "pure religion" and "pure worship", which I used to hear a lot as a jw, and indeed considered myself to be practicing, are totally meaningless.

  • Gregor
    Gregor

    Of course religion is a stew of mankinds accumulated superstitions, political manipulations and, thankfully, mans instinctive sense of right and wrong - which is one of the most primitive emotions we all are instilled with. It is recognized in the ground rules of most all religions - except Hedonism, one of the oldest religions of manking, which has been enjoying a comeback.

    free2bemee - Great essay.

  • JamesThomas
    JamesThomas

    Pure religion clearly seen as an oxymoron, is a valuable observation, free2beme.

    Religion is a product of the ever-changing mind; as is our personal god(s) of which religion is but a story in which they dwell; as is the "me" whose story it all is.

    We have made an important discovery that the minds "spiritual" and "personal" fruits are unreliable. So, now what? Shall we pick more apples? Or find the true Source from which the orchard grows?

    What actually sees the mind and all it's grand and cherished stories of gods, universe and self? Is IT, part of the drama? Does IT change or morph? Perhaps the purity and truth we seek is so close and intimate, it was missed.

    What really looks out these eyes?

    alt

    j

  • SirNose586
    SirNose586

    She makes me wish I were Muslim.

  • parakeet
    parakeet

    ***What really looks out these eyes?***
    Someone who's thinking, "This rotten veil itches like hell."

  • Mysterious
    Mysterious

    I think no religion is pure, if you look back far enough they have all borrowed customs from each other and practices of the ancients. I also think there is no true religion, they are just tailor made coping mechanisms for various people. I find that I often shy away from anyone who outright speaks about "true religion" "pure religion" or anyway implies they think they are part of god's chosen people.

  • free2beme
    free2beme

    JamesThomas

    I really liked that picture. I was wondering though if she is truly a Muslim or a model. As I thought Muslims were forbidden to wear make-up.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit