violas: Well Oub, I do know that if you accuse your brother wrongly there are consequences. That is slander ...
In my experience this is NOT true if the one making the accusation is an elder.
by Oubliette 19 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
violas: Well Oub, I do know that if you accuse your brother wrongly there are consequences. That is slander ...
In my experience this is NOT true if the one making the accusation is an elder.
I think the BOrg should hunt apostates like witches
if they don't burn then they're an apostate
Village Idiot - "I was told that in my judicial committee. Specifically, 'If you were in Israel you would be stoned'."
That actually used to happen with my Dad when I was a teen; if he thought I was out of line, he'd get mad and remind me that under the Mosaic law, Isrealite parents were required to stone their disrespectful kids to death.
Eventually, I got sick of hearing it, and responded with, "you sure must wish you could!"
You can imagine the look on his face...
...to which I responded with, "you certainly talk about it often enough. What else am I supposed to think?".
From that moment on, he never said it again.
x
FTR, my relationship with my Dad vastly improved after I reached my 20s and moved out. We actually became friends.
Vidiot, I'm glad you and your dad were able to move beyond the insanity of this cult!
It's really unbelievable what it does to people.
I wouldn't be surprised if you surveyed JWs on the subject of, "Would you support stoning an apostate/those who leave the faith?" You'd probably see Islam-esque numbers in support of the practice.
JWs are every bit as fervent about their faith as those of Islamic faith, the only difference of note is that at the moment JWs look for J-Hov to do the dirty work instead of handling it themselves.
I'm pretty sure though, if the GB passed down a doctrine bringing back stoning, there'd be many JWs packing their briefcases full of Old Testament "justice." Especially the little old sisters, they'd be first in line for a good ol' fashioned stone throwin'.
If disfellowshipping is merely a substitute for stoning, they can never claim that it is done with love as a motivator. It is purely punitive at that point. You can't teach a lot of lessons to a dead man, but you can punish someone severely and make them regret their decisions while alive if you apply the right pressure. Let's face it, disfellowshipping isn't done out of love, that's just a way to get people to rationalize it so that they can feel good about carrying out the dirty work of organizational control. In my case, reaching out to a disfellowshipped person has resulted in me being shunned by many. I'd rather be shunned for doing the loving thing than loved for doing the shunning thing. It is psychological bullying.
Oubliette - "I'm glad you and your dad were able to move beyond the insanity of this cult!"
We didn't really; he was a loyal JW to the end (literally), and I was still in when he passed, but he could be persuaded by reason and common sense.
I faded years later.
Oubliette - "JWs are every bit as fervent about their faith as those of Islamic faith, the only difference of note is that at the moment JWs look for J-Hov to do the dirty work instead of handling it themselves. I'm pretty sure though, if the GB passed down a doctrine bringing back stoning, there'd be many JWs packing their briefcases full of Old Testament 'justice'."
Important to remember.
x
I've said this before, but IMO it bears repeating...
...in the (admittedly unlikely) event the WTS were given control of a small country, I guarantee you that within a decade, democracy and freedom of speech would be nonexistent, divorce and any form of alternative sexual expression would be outlawed, creationism would be mandated in schools, DFed individuals would be stripped of citizenship and imprisoned or deported, and "apostates" would be sentenced to death without possibility of appeal or reprieve.
It would be American far-right Christian Nationalists' wet dream writ small.