have been in arguments with a friend of my dad who is an elder and also a biochemist. Because of his supposed vast knowledge of chemistry I am supposed to be so inclined to take everything he says as fact… not happening.
I have heard the creationist (JW) theory on timelines, carbon dating, even the absurd theory of a water canopy before the flood in Noah’s day. One comment that always strikes me as odd is when you are talking about this subject with someone that believes in creation, I always heard this: “all these evolutionary scientists are trying to disprove the bible.” WRONG they are simply collecting data. Never have I heard or read about a scientist saying now I can finally prove the bible wrong. If you were to do some research you would find that a good number of those scientists are god fearing people.
If scientists found a fossil, radiocarbon dating is not changed by a “water canopy” and even if that absurd idea was a historical fact it wouldn’t have changed the outcome of the research data. As soon as a living organism dies, it stops taking in new carbon. The ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14 at death is the same as every other living thing, but the carbon-14 decays and is not replaced. The carbon-14 decays with its half-life (look it up) of while the amount of carbon-12 remains constant in the sample. If you look at the ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14 in the sample and comparing it to the ratio in a living organism, it is possible, if not probable to determine the age of a formerly living thing with little error. Finally if the Adam and eve story was indeed fact, it wouldn’t now have been that long ago, considering the actually time line of the earth. Besides even if the dating was off by thousands of years it still disproves the biblical timeline.
I suggest anyone who is a creationist to do some research that isn’t completely bias. Also keep in mind that most of these scientists are not out there to prove the bible wrong, but just like everyone else, we are trying to learn.
You couldn’t sit on a jury and make a verdict if you haven’t heard from the defense and the prosecution, so why do it in this case.