The new clergy child abuse film: Deliver Us From Evil

by MegaDude 13 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • MegaDude
    MegaDude

    I saw this last night. I recommend it highly. Really superb film that explores this troubling issue from multiple angles:

    The molester priest who confesses on camera and tells his story.

    The victims who are now adults and their stories, and their parents' stories.

    The clergy in high places who protected these pedophiles and kept moving them from place to place. Clips from their video depositions are played and reveal the real character of these power-hungry men who drape themselves in religious garments and a false aura of being God's leader. As a former JW, you can really relate to this!

    The molesting priest is clearly some sort of well functioning, charming, smart psychopath. He grins and smiles the entire time he is being interviewed. He gives the clear impression he is completely disassociated from any harm he has done. I had the impression he was almost delighted with the attention he was getting being on camera.

    The victims tell their sad stories, but what was more tragic was witnessing the interviews with the parents of the victims who appear more devastated than their now grown children. At one point one of the fathers is crying and yells "I do not believe in God anymore!!!!!" while his still-believing Catholic daughter weeps.

    The molesting priest was deported back to his home country of Ireland having been given an annuity pension to live on by the Catholic Church. He is free and not under the scrutiny of the authorities. He is filmed watching children play in a park. He freely admits he is turned on by kids.

    The molester was constantly protected over the years by Cardinal Mahoney in Los Angeles, California, and shuttled from parish to parish as he kept sodomizing, raping children, including a nine month old infant, and in one case carried on an affair with one victim's mother. Cardinal Mahoney could not allow a scandal in his diocese if he wanted to be promoted to archbishop of Los Angeles, which he attained two years after shuttling the molesting priest to a new parish. The molester's victims number in the hundreds over his 20 year spree.

    One of the priests depicted in the film is Father Tom Doyle who is a strong advocate against abuse. His career in the church is essentially ruined because of his outspokeness. He is brutally frank about the Catholic's church's problems and refuses to back down. He speaks to groups and is a victim's advocate.

    One interesting fact is brought out that the current Pope Benedict who presided over committees looking into Catholic priest child abuse petitioned President George Bush for immunity from prosecution, which was granted.

    The film goes into the warped sexual psychology of these men who serve as priests and is blunt in saying it is a sexualized priesthood.

    Really worth seeing.

  • bikerchic
    bikerchic

    Sounds like a great watch Mega!

    Another thread on it which might give the time and dates it shows here:

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/8/123036/1.ashx

  • Big Tex
    Big Tex
    and is blunt in saying it is a sexualized priesthood

    I'm intrigued by this comment. Sexualized how? Is the film inferring that celibate priests are acting out sexually in other ways?

    Chris

  • MegaDude
    MegaDude

    I wouldn't be surprised if Cardinal Mahoney is forced to retire after this film is seen more.

  • bikerchic
    bikerchic

    Chris:

    Sexualized how?

    I wonder if it's the old adage of taking away something from someone makes them want it all the more? You know the forbidden fruit syndrome?

    Did I just name a new syndrome? FFS?

    Just thinking out loud here but you raise a good question I wonder if it clarifies it in the film.

  • Big Tex
    Big Tex

    Did I just name a new syndrome? FFS?

    The Dreaded and Feared FFS!

  • MegaDude
    MegaDude

    It's a sexualized priesthood because of enforced celibacy and outdated religious views about sex. In a lot of cases these priests have begun their religious education and career at about 15 and have infantile views about sex and little understanding of their own sexual identity. They are expected to repress their sexual feelings and they can't.

    The priests weren't always expected to be celibate. In the early days of the Catholic Church the popes married, priests married and had families. The celibacy rule came about in order to keep the priest's property which would normally be inherited by his family.

    The film states that the people running the Catholic Church for the longest time have simply had the view if a priest had sex with a little girl or boy it was the same as having sex with an adult, that the priest had broken his vow of chastity and needed counseling and rehabilitation.

  • blondie
    blondie

    I saw this last year at the SNAP conference in Chicago and met Amy Berg. It is good to see people put their resources and talents into fighting child sexual abuse in a religious setting. Every victory that people like Amy Berg have and that SNAP has is a victory for every person victimized sexually by a religious organization.

    http://www.snapnetwork.org/

    Blondie

  • Big Tex
    Big Tex
    The film states that the people running the Catholic Church for the longest time have simply had the view if a priest had sex with a little girl or boy it was the same as having sex with an adult, that the priest had broken his vow of chastity and needed counseling and rehabilitation.

    Wow. That's just ... wow.

    No doubt they also thought the kids were "asking for it".

  • MegaDude
    MegaDude

    This priest is also featured in the film.

    Catholic Priest Who Aids Church Sexual Abuse Victims Loses Job

    April 29, 2004
    By DANIEL J. WAKIN

    Twenty years ago, the Rev. Thomas Doyle warned the nation's Roman Catholic bishops about the church's looming sexual abuse nightmare. Since then, he has become a hero to the victims, speaking out on their behalf and helping them in legal cases in recent years.

    In doing so, Father Doyle also became a thorn in the side of the church hierarchy.

    In the latest chapter of his turbulent career, Father Doyle was quietly removed from his job as an Air Force chaplain in a clash with his archbishop over pastoral issues.

    He lost his endorsement as a chaplain from the Archdiocese of Military Services in September, a decision that until now had not become public. The leader of the Archdiocese of Military Services, Archbishop Edwin F. O'Brien, said Father Doyle had flouted his guidelines about requiring daily Mass for Catholics on military bases and other pastoral issues.

    But the demotion has outraged abuse victims and their advocates, who point to the last several years of scandals as affirmation of Father Doyle's longstanding concerns. They say they suspect he was reassigned in retaliation by the church hierarchy. And it has produced a messy coda to a military career that Father Doyle said he loved deeply.

    Father Doyle had served as an Air Force chaplain since 1986. He was at Ramstein Air Force Base in Germany from 2001 until September, when he was transferred to Seymour Johnson Air Force Base near Goldsboro, N.C., where he now provides drug and alcohol counseling services but does not serve as a chaplain.

    Speaking from Bamberg, Germany, Archbishop O'Brien rejected suggestions that he was punishing Father Doyle. He said that since he became archbishop seven years ago, he had tolerated the priest's criticisms of the hierarchy even if they were sometimes "over the top."

    He also said he could have waited until Father Doyle retired in August and avoided the turmoil. "But I can't abdicate my pastoral responsibility because of what some others who are rather deeply involved in the sex-abuse issue would conclude," he said.

    Father Doyle declined to characterize his reassignment as punitive. "I don't think it would be fair for me to say yes it is, no it isn't," he said. He said he did not want to "pick a fight" with his archbishop and was neither angry nor bitter. However, he acknowledged that his role as victim's advocate "has not been received well by many bishops."

    His dismissal stemmed from a memorandum he wrote for two superiors at Ramstein interpreting the archbishop's expectations for how Catholic base personnel should be ministered to. On several points, he appears to contradict the written guidelines of Archbishop O'Brien.

    For example, the archbishop had said that base chaplains were expected to celebrate Mass daily and that Catholics at installations with assigned priests "have the right to attend Mass regularly."

    Actually, Father Doyle wrote, Catholics do not have a right to daily Mass, according to church law. Daily Mass is a strong custom, but not "an essential element of the practice" of the faith. He also contradicted Archbishop O'Brien by saying the archbishop's permission was not needed to substitute a communion service on Sunday for a Mass if no Catholic priest was available.

    Father Doyle said his memorandum came to the attention of the archbishop when an employee of the Catholic ministry at the base found a copy. The employee, believing that it meant she would lose her daily Mass, sent it to the archbishop's office.

    Archbishop O'Brien said Father Doyle's positions had caused him to lose confidence. "There is nothing more important to our priests and our people than the Eucharistic celebration," he wrote in terminating the priest's chaplaincy. "Your refusal to accept that and your attempt to provide an alternate authority on that issue is unacceptable."

    For his part, Father Doyle said that he was giving his opinion on church requirements at a time when there was a shortage of priests to cover Ramstein and two nearby bases. He said he completely accepted the central role of the Eucharist and the archbishop's authority.

    Father Doyle is a member of the Dominican order, and his superior, the Rev. Michael Mascari, wrote a letter of support to the archbishop, relaying the priest's apologies and explanations and asking the archbishop to reconsider.

    Father Doyle's supporters are convinced he himself is now a victim.

    "I think the hierarchy has been gunning after him for a long time," said Jason Berry, an author of "Vows of Silence: The Abuse of Power in the Papacy of John Paul II," which includes a sympathetic portrait of Father Doyle. "He has probably done more damage to the Catholic hierarchy of any priest in America."

    Jeff Anderson, a lawyer in St. Paul who has brought such cases for 22 years and often involved Father Doyle, said the priest's help was often crucial in forcing dioceses to settle cases. "He's the guy in the inside that knows how it works and how they work," Mr. Anderson said, referring to the bishops.

    The priest's involvement in the abuse issue dates to the mid-1980's, when he was an aide to the Vatican representative in Washington and helped write a confidential report, often cited now, about the dimensions of sexual abuse by priests and dealing with the problem legally and pastorally. He grew increasingly vocal in his support for abuse victims, speaking to many personally as well as giving talks and testifying.

    "He is far and away the single greatest ray of hope for many, many victims," said David Clohessy, national director of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests.

    Father Doyle complicated his position after losing his endorsement by seeking to replace it with one from the Holy Orthodox Catholic Church, a small body unrelated to the Roman Catholic Church. The priest called that endorsement a bureaucratic fig leaf to keep chaplain status so that he could stay on past his required retirement in August, when he turns 60, and receive a better retirement package. He now calls that decision a mistake and has renounced it.

    But the damage was done. A group of priests on Long Island who had invited Father Doyle to speak earlier in April withdrew the request because of rumors he was an apostate.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit