My feeling is that I wouldn't casually take blood, anymore than I would casually take a kidney or a lens for my eye. However, in a life and death situation, where there was a question as to whether I would live or die-I would want the blood. Imminent death seems a bit more dangerous than hepatitis or even AIDS. If I survive some life threatening trauma only to aquire AIDS, then there will be something valuable to the experience. If someone is asking me if I want a blood boost-NO, I think its stupid. I figure if I am unable to make the decision, it means I really really need it. If I am conscious and able to consent, I would be able to use my judgement.
I have had SO many surgeries, and so much physical trauma, that I don't think anything would repulse me that would save a life. My eldest son, when he was born had some severe problems and blood was given as a potential need/option. I was very young then and I had only been out of the org for a few years, but I told them if it was really nec. then they should do what was required to keep him alive and healthy. So, when push comes to shove regarding my kids, I know where I stand, and i have never doubted it. Even as a 21 year old. At that time, my mom was really trying to influence me otherwise, she was appalled by the pregnancy, appalled by the medical problems I had during it and when my son was born, she actually said (after he had been diagnosed with severe Group B Strep) that perhaps it was for the best if he died. Since his father was a so-and-so, etc, etc. I forgave her that, but I have never forgotten it. She has never been on my list to raise the kids if something happened to me. It repulses me to think of these people who would make an idol of blood, while denying its purpose-LIFE.