I wrote to Ray a couple of times. This letter from Sep 05 shows he strongly was against the idea that anyone but Jesus has the authority to direct Christians.
I know Geoff Jackson personally and know he is smart and nice. I asked Ray if he thought such a person would see through the GB and be likely to leave as he did. This was his response.
Dear Paul,
Thanks for your letter. I spent two weeks in Germany in September and am now still trying to catch up with things. You say of Geoff Jackson that: He claimed to be in awe of the older GB members and the great knowledge and energy that they possess I do not know, of course, to whom he refers as so many have died since I was there. But with me it was just the contrary. Almost from the first GB meeting onward I was severely disturbed to see how little Scriptural knowledge most members manifested. I had expected to witness meetings where God’s Word played a major part but it seemed rarely to come into the picture. The same was true with the conducting of the morning discussions at the breakfast table, chair manned on a weekly basis by a GB member. With the great majority, their concluding comments were mainly a repetition of WT material with very little of original thought or research. Very few of them are true students of the Scriptures, virtually none are scholars (my uncle perhaps being the only member who could be viewed in that light). Perhaps one overriding concern as regards any expression that does not hold to the “party line” stems from fear, for they must realize, even if subconsciously, that their position is weak on many issues. Even here, however, I think that many believe that they are acting to protect the only “good” religion left on earth.
As to their sincerity then, it is, I believe, as to their belief that they are serving God, and their belief that the organization they head is superior to all other religious organizations on the face of the earth. In the latter case, I believe they can hold that belief only by being in a state of denial, not allowing themselves to face the reality of the organization’s flawed course and seriously flawed record. Whatever their sincerity in their desire to serve God, it has not protected them from a remarkable insensitivity to the disillusioning effect of their failed apocalyptic predictions on the membership, the weakening effect it has on their confidence in the reliability and worth of the Scriptures.
I doubt that the reason for the secretive and authoritarian nature of the organization’s leadership can be reduced down to any one or two factors. Knowing the men, I have no question that some, such as John Booth, George Gangas and others, simply believed, somewhat blindly, that the organization is God’s sole channel. They seem to have no other motivation. Others manifested a degree, greater or smaller, of ambition and concern for prestige. Only a few displayed some measure of willingness to act in a harsh manner reminiscent of inquisitional times. Among the Governing Body members as a whole there was not great excitement about the 1975 predictions. As shown in Crisis of Conscience, they did express a measure of concern as to the possibility of disillusionment at one meeting described. But in other respects, it was almost as if they were bystanders, watching what went on but not feeling directly involved or responsible. This degree of detachment was not unusual and illustrates the effect of being an elite body.