I admit it, I made fun of the Mormons along with the rest of the JWs. We always though it was really funny that they were following the instructions in "The Book of the Mormons" which is the 2nd verse of the new testament given to their 16 y/o prophet by God and Jesus Christ. Imagine that any religion could place any co-called "holy book" on the same plane as the bible! We were both outraged and amused.
Now I'm re-reading some of the WT documents and I'm noticing some embarrassing parallels.
For example, in the KM of 8/2002 which explains how we should treat expelled relatives, the article fluidly moves back and forth using quoted from the bible and the WT to prove their point.
Let's review this a moment; the WT believes that quotes from The Watchtower rag (no bible references, just writing committee words) are equally important as words from the bible?
A direct contradiction from the WT explanation that the bible requires we not even say a greeting to expelled ones (2John10) is found in Para #6 of the KM. In it the WT makes up their own rules and now permits families to decide whether expelled ones who live in the same house (meaning parents and minor children, they really are backing the shunning of Mommy, Daddy or the kids) will be permitted to eat with the rest of the family. Again they cite THE WATCHTOWER not the bible in declaring this rule.
I know that we can find a thousand examples of the WT using prior editions of the WT to "prove" something, but were we ever aware that they considered the rules in Watchtower mags to be on the same plane as biblical ones?
If the Watchtower rag is sacrocanct then how could every edition before the 1995 1914 reversal have been wrong?