That's What I'M Talkin' About! (page 5)

hillary_step

Some 'awesome' responses to this thread.

HS

Kaput

While we are on the subject I would appreciate someone suggesting ways that I may murder people who say 'Duhhhhh', and 'Hellooooo' as a means of accenting the fact that someone has behaved stupidly, and stay out of prison.

Don't get your hands dirty...just give Whitey Bulger a call.

RAF

If that is what i'm talking about, who ever said it would be what I'm talking about anyway (lazy or not it helps when someone can just put it the right way).

HappyDad

Right on Bro...........jes a bunch o fly....

Thanks Farkel, I really appreciated your post because I feel the same way. "know what I'm sayin'?

HappyDad

ignored_one

You get me?

"Well I was talking to Farkel yeah? And he was so pissed off yeah. Then Hillary Step walked in and was like all you know what i'm talking about yeah? And I was like yeah, yeah."

rassillon

proplog: I was just about to post the same thing.

Language evolution is natural. Society has to find a way to express itself which is not always accuratly possible in the venacular. Thus a new modified adjunct to the language is added, in time it is either accepted or discarded.

What-A-Coincidence

foshizzle mynizzle

Farkel

Unconfused,

Well. With nearly 200 posts under your belt and a whopping 2 months on this board, you certainly have the experience and qualifications to pass absolute judgement on me or anyone else you want to judge. To put it delicately, your "tenure" here wouldn't qualify you to eat my snot. Unless you've read what else I've contributed over the years and can form a logical argument for your generalized judgment of me you should refrain from profiling me based upon one or a few experiences. You don't agree with that? Then, you should hate your parents for the one or few things that they did that YOU consider to be bad, ignoring the many things that just happened to be good.

Judgmental jerks are bad enough. NEWBIE judgmental jerks are quite another thing. I tell you what. You read my articles and conversations on the Internet over the last TEN years, and THEN judge me overall. God would at least give me that chance. Will you? If not, maybe should read your puny 200 posts and then post a thread thrashing them.

Farkel

UnConfused

Farkal,

I have about 3000 posts under my belt as I used to post as Confusedjw and recently changed after successfully fading. As to judging you I'll say this. I have read one productive thread you have started concerning Judge Rutherford's potential mistress. The rest have been about your music, neutral or outright sarcastic. Somehow you think that having posted diatribes shooting holes in the anti-logic of the WT, in the past, gives you a license to treat people with disdain. Further, as to judging you or your body of words on the internet, if you could have simply posted an apology to that girl or displayed even a minor amount of humility or contriteness it would have made a difference to me, but you simply wouldn't and justified your bad form.

The reason I brought this up is you have now started a thread about the very same topic you judged this poor gal on.

So who really is judging inappropriately Farkel? You or me?

But anyone can have a bad day and I hope yours lead you to better cheer.

Cheers,

Confusedjw/Unconfused

(p.s. - your reference to snot just about sums up your attitude.)

itsallgoodnow

remember kids, don't drink and post! say no to drunk posting!

That's What I'M Talkin' About!

Share this