Taliban Official has asked for future raids to be in the daylight....hope that clarifies the position for JanH.
ISP
by Englishman 36 Replies latest jw friends
Taliban Official has asked for future raids to be in the daylight....hope that clarifies the position for JanH.
ISP
and keep in mind the date ... october, 7th!!!
530 years ago, on october 7th 1571, the osmanic fleet was defeated at the town of Lepanto in gulf of Korinth. Don Juan d'Austria, who lead the papal venetian league, fought Ali Pascha - and won. But this battle back then the whole thing was about international trading-routes - not about fighting terrorists.
cecil
ah, but they're trading in spiritual souls here . . .
Taliban will shoot any drivers of cars that do not have several permissions and a few passwords.
More interesting: Russian air defenses are not on alert during this US presense in Uzbekastan, this implying a great amount of trust from Putin for the US. dubyas will love it.
In that pretaped video, Bin Laden materially admitted to the WTC attack.
Hey, my neigbor just told me that she just saw on tv that Osama just admitted to the Sept 11 attack. and that he declared war on the US in the name of Islam she said that he said "all isreal has to go. all israelis have to leave palestine or he will fight until he has destroyed every american"
Has anyone else heard this?
Lilacs
cecil
One source claims this is about oil pipelines and control of its marketing. Caspians sea oil to be specific. And the markets are in india and china. The pipelines would run through afghanistan. It's fairly long but you can read it if you want, at: http://www.rense.com/general14/evlusive.htm
ISP,
That's hilarious!
The Talaban asking us to attack when its most convienient for them.
I hope that is a joke or they are crazier than I already thought!
Ranchette
Courtesy ala my bro-in-law:
What to do if you happen upon a peace rally by stupid naïve hemp-shirt-wearing college idiots, to teach them why force is sometimes needed:
1) Approach dumb rich ignorant student talking about "peace" and saying there should be, "no retaliation."
2) Engage in brief conversation, ask if military force is appropriate.
3) When he says "No," ask, "Why not?"
4) Wait until he says something to the effect of, "Because that would
just cause more innocent deaths, which would be awful and we should not cause more violence."
5) When he's in mid sentence, punch him in the face as hard as you can.
6) When he gets back up to up to punch you, point out that it would
be a mistake and contrary to his values to strike you, because that
would, "be awful and he should not cause more violence."
7) Wait until he agrees that he has pledged not to commit additional violence.
8) Punch him in the face again, harder this time. Repeat steps 5
through 8 until they understand that sometimes it is necessary to punch back.
closer
Mean People Produce
Little Mean People
lol very good illustration closer...course if you really want to make the point...punch his girlfriend...or his mother...or his child...
The U.S. is also making food aid drops to the 24 million who survive by our generosity.
TR
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
—Edmund Burke