Google earth adds Crises in Darfur, you must check this out

by needproof 25 Replies latest jw friends

  • needproof
    needproof

    Anybody not yet familiar with Google Earth should try it, www.earth.google.com - Offers maps and satellite images for complex or pinpointed regional searches.

    Recently Google have added satellite shots of Sudan, where a mass genocide is taking place whilst we go to bed each night in our safe and sound environments (relatively). Up to 300,000 people dead so far - why the hell doesn't Blair or Bush do something about this seeing as though they are so beset with helping other people (bs)...

    Terrible crises in Darfur, but what can we do?

  • purplesofa
  • needproof
    needproof

    Not much interest in this thread..

  • purplesofa
    purplesofa
    Not much interest in this thread..

    If you think about it, there is not much interest in the media about this either so alot of people are not aware of what is going on. Probably alot of people that are aware now did not know until George Clooney has gotten involved. His celebrity status has brought it to the general publics attention.

    The ongoing Darfur Genocide is no accident, no local tribal conflict. The genocide is the brutal plan of three men in the Sudanese national Government -- President Bashir, Vice-President Taha, Security Chief Gosh. Now they are spreading their system of terror to other African countries, including Chad and the Central African Republic . Yet our governments continue to cut deals with them - deals they repeatedly break. It is time for the US and European governments to stop appeasing genocide. We call on our governments to fully support the International Criminal Court to indict the perpetrators of genocide, and to help ensure their arrest. It is time for justice, because only justice can bring peace.

    For Bashir, Taha and Gosh, it is time for handcuffs, not handshakes.

    http://www.forbes.com/business/feeds/afx/2007/04/11/afx3602949.html US delays sanctions against Sudan over Darfur at UN request
    04.11.07, 2:08 PM ET

    Popular VideosShowdown: Maidment vs. Lenzner Box Office Previews Going For Growth Hendrix Gets Bottled A Major League Make Over
    Most Popular Stories
    How To Say No
    Where Is The U.S. Economy Going?
    How Companies Are Helping Dads
    Celebrity Fashion Reaches Critical Mass
    High-Security, High-End Homes

    LONDON (Thomson Financial) - The United States held off on a decision to impose unilateral sanctions against Sudan last month to give UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon a last chance to convince Khartoum to allow UN peacekeepers into its war-torn Darfur region, a senior US official said.

    Andrew Natsios, President George W. Bush's special envoy to Sudan, said Washington was on the verge of imposing financial and other sanctions against the Sudanese at the end of last month but held off because a US congressional delegation was in Khartoum at the time.

    Ban then asked on April 2 for an additional two to four weeks to pressure Sudan's government to lift its opposition to deployment of the UN force of some 20,000 troops to Darfur before turning to sanctions.

    'I think we need to give him a chance -- that means if he asks for a two- to four-week delay we need to give him that,' Natsios told a Senate hearing.

    The US sanctions package now on Bush's desk includes financial actions against 29 Sudanese companies and a toughening of implementation of existing sanctions on 130 other firms, all linked to the Khartoum government, he said.

    They would also slap travel bans and assets freezes on a Darfur rebel leader who has been 'obstructing' peace efforts and on 'war criminals' among the Sudanese government leaders, he said.

    Counting deaths

    This mother had just arrived with her sick baby at Abu Shouk IDP camp in North Darfur. This mother had just arrived with her sick baby at Abu Shouk IDP camp in North Darfur.

    Accurate numbers of dead have been difficult to estimate, partly because the Sudanese government places formidable obstacles in front of journalists attempting to cover the conflict. [79] In September 2004, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated there had been 50,000 deaths in Darfur since the beginning of the conflict, an 18-month period, mostly due to starvation. An updated estimate the following month put the number of deaths for the 6-month period from March to October 2004 due to starvation and disease at 70,000; These figures were criticized, because they only considered short periods and did not include violent deaths. [80] A more recent British Parliamentary Report has estimated that over 300,000 people have died, [81] and others have estimated even more.

    In March 2005, the UN's Emergency Relief CoordinatorJan Egeland estimated that 10,000 were dying each month excluding deaths due to ethnic violence. [82] An estimated 2 million people had at that time been displaced from their homes, mostly seeking refuge in camps in Darfur's major towns. Two hundred thousand had fled to neighboring Chad.

    In an April 2005 report, the most comprehensive statistical analysis to date, the Coalition for International Justice estimated that 400,000 people in Darfur had died since the conflict began, a figure most humanitarian and human rights groups now use. [83]

    On 28 April 2006, Dr. Eric Reeves argued that "extant data, in aggregate, strongly suggest that total excess mortality in Darfur, over the course of more than three years of deadly conflict, now significantly exceeds 450,000," but this has not been independently verified. [84]

    A 21 September 2006 article by the official UN News Service stated that "UN officials estimate over 400,000 people have lost their lives and some 2 million more have been driven from their homes." [85] This now appears to be the official UN figure.

  • SWALKER
    SWALKER

    Wouldn't you know that it probably is about OIL?!!!

    "Southern Darfur, like southern Sudan, is rich in oil. The Chinese National Petroleum Corporation holds the large oil concession in southern Darfur. Chinese soldiers are alleged to be protecting Chinese oil interests."

    I would imagine that the U.S. doesn't want to get imbroiled in a fight within another Muslim country...that has the prospect of inciting the Chinese government as well.

    Read this article:

    http://www.twf.org/News/Y2004/0807-Darfur.html

    Swalker

  • Jourles
    Jourles
    why the hell doesn't Blair or Bush do something about this seeing as though they are so beset with helping other people (bs)...

    Because it is much more important to focus American/British efforts in exposing to the world that Iraqi fighters are being trained in Iran on how to fight and use EFP's against our occupational liberating forces. American troops are in danger, man! Priorities!

    I sure hope we attack Iran very soon before '09. Beyond that, the anti-war democrats will likely be in charge -- and you know how far diplomacy gets us in the world. Our window of opportunity is shrinking fast so we need to use the evidence we have obtained thus far and blaze a trail of American "Blood & Guts" Glory into Tehran. Let's kick some Iranian ass! Screw Darfur.

  • purplesofa
    purplesofa

    is there oil interest for the US there?

  • SWALKER
    SWALKER

    I think the U.S. was/may be interested in oil there, but the Chinese have evidently moved into the picture. As we already have our troops tied up in Iraq, we don't have the manpower to pursue the issue in Darfur as well. Who knows what is going on behind the scenes??? China should at least send in their forces to keep the peace!

    Swalker

  • Sasha
    Sasha

    You must boycott the China Olympics. China funds the violence in Darfur!!!! Everybody knows this!

  • cyrus
    cyrus

    Another muslim country persecuted other muslims bunch of raghead scum

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit