"Another comment was.. homosexuality is so bad that the host asshole would give up his daughter rather than having some dude get raped"
Holy shit! Did we attend the same congregation? Are you in the Caribbean by any chance?
by user100 18 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
"Another comment was.. homosexuality is so bad that the host asshole would give up his daughter rather than having some dude get raped"
Holy shit! Did we attend the same congregation? Are you in the Caribbean by any chance?
Is it just me, or does that bible account seem eerily similar to the account of the men surrounding Lot's house wanting to rape the angels? It has been said by one bible expert that this story is actually a bit of false propaganda designed to paint the people in that area as being as vile as the Sodomites, thus the story was deliberately written to mimic the account with Lot.
It has also been said that the story of Lot's daughters drunking him and raping him is also a bit of propaganda designed to tarnish the image of the Moabites and the Ammonites - the nations supposedly born out of the incestuous relations mentioned in the account. This seems to make sense as such an account provides no real spiritual benefit at all. I can think of no reason why such sordid details of how the Moabites and Ammonites came into being is of any spiritual benefit. It only makes sense to share such info if the motive is the tarnish the image of those nations.
I don't mean to be picky island man...... but, is it possible for a woman or in Lot's case two women
to "rape" a drunk man?
This is some fatally flawed logic:
Sometimes Jehovah tests to see how far you will persevere in begging him to get things done.
22,000 die the first time + 18,000 die the second time. All of those were just being "tested" by jehovah? After they died, how much further could that 40,000 "persevere in begging him to get things done?" Did these dead men pass or fail jehovah's "test"? And I thought jehovah didn't test people with evil, right? Or is seeing 40,000 dead a good test?
How did I ever get sucked in to believing this crap .
smiddy
"I don't mean to be picky island man...... but, is it possible for a woman or in Lot's case two women
to "rape" a drunk man?"
You're not being picky at all. I don't think it's possible. That's one of the reasons why I don't believe the story is true but is just a piece of false propaganda devised by the writer(s) of Genesis to tarnish the image of the Moabites and the Ammonites. How do you make the Ammonites and Moabites inherently degenerate when they're the descendants of righteous Lot, without tarnishing Righteous Lot; and how do you do it in a way that cannot be disproved? Simple: You say these nations were the product of an incestuous relationship between Lot and his daughters - but righteous Lot is not to be blames because he was drugged and raped by his daughters. And because these incestuous relations happened in the isolated mountains away from anyones sight, no one can come forward and disprove the writer's claims. See how that works?
Another comment was.. homosexuality is so bad that the host asshole would give up his daughter rather than having some dude get raped.
And the little gay boy or lesbian youth sitting quietly in the auditorium is asking, "Why am I such an abomination, God? Why won't you answer my prayers and change me? What did I do to offend you?"
Years later that young adult will have decided God's mind is made up, whatever the reason, so what's the point of trying... or in some cases, continuing.
Bravo, religion!
so my point is.. the GB encourages people to read the bible and meditate on it.. but you are forced to draw the same conclusion the GB made. or you are forced to interpret the verses the way the GB/FDS interprets them.