..One crashed in my yard too!..Thats the third one this year..There were 4 last year,7 the year before..I`m getting tired of this sh*t!....I`m willing to give Spaceships away,as long as you tow them at your own expense..Give me a call.....LOL!!...OUTLAW
UFO Crash in New Mexico
by metatron 19 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
metatron
Research? Rense? Wait a minute...
Rense is simply a site that accumulates information from all over the place. Much of it is inaccurate
and biased but since it simply posts such material uncritically, I find it repellent that you simply
dismiss such items altogether lumped together prejudicially. Simply because it's posted there
means nothing as to its origin or truthfulness, it's just posted there.
And as for the matter of UFO's , I don't see how any honest person can investigate this field, even
superficially, and not conclude that the US government is not to be believed on the subject.
The semi-official COMETA report from French military and political officials made this same
point. So, when you assert that 'hoaxers' exist as the cause for some phenomena, I suggest
you contrast such with the proven fact that the US government has little credibility in this
and many other matters. Life is often a game of poker and you have no choice but to choose
one liar over others.
metatron
-
needproof
I fail to see why I should not believe in something just because it is posted on a website which speaks of 'conspiracy theories'. I agree that I have read a lot of rubbish on Rense but I like to keep an open mind about things. You would never believe anything again if you applied this rule, you would just bin every newspaper, turn off every media outlet and go to bed with your fingers in your ears refusing to believe anything.
I am not denying Rense has some off the wall theories, but just like anything else, I will take the information, check it out and take it or throw it away - and that's the beauty of America, freedom of speech.
-
metatron
Exactly. Rense has all sorts of anti-semitic, anti-American, pro-holocaust denier stuff on it - much
that I don't like but I sometimes force myself to read things I don't agree with to regularily re-examine
my beliefs.
metatron
-
needproof
Yes, I myself came to the realization that Rense wasn't perhaps 100% accurate when I noticed articles on Bigfoot. Although, like I said, why not stay open minded. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
-
Abaddon
Here's the link;
http://www.skepdic.com/aztec.html
metatron
Look, you do it to yourself you do. I almost KNOW you will be in on any thread insisting that something that is unproven exists and there is a big cover-up that you know about as you are so clever.
Rense is simply a site that accumulates information from all over the place. Much of it is inaccurate and biased but since it simply posts such material uncritically, I find it repellent that you simply dismiss such items altogether lumped together prejudicially.
Using a site that knowingly publishes any concievable rubbish as a source of information is like using a trash can as a source of food. There's an evolutionst called Hooberus on this board who uses a website I have shown time and time again to be utter rubbish to support his mad Creationist beliefs. I am sure you think he's mistaken yet your research has all the rigour, reliability and methodology of his.
Simply because it's posted there means nothing as to its origin or truthfulness, it's just posted there.
And as for the matter of UFO's , I don't see how any honest person can investigate this field, even superficially, and not conclude that the US government is not to be believed on the subject.
LOL. That assumpton is based on you assuming there is truth to stories of UFO's. Can't you see the flaw in the logic of that?
Some people say they have seen UFO's -> You think there are UFO's -> Therefore any denial of UFO's by the US government is a lie.
It's called presupositionalism; doesn't matter whether one is presupposing the existence of god or of UFO's, in neither case does one have EVIDENCE, but despite this the presumption is used as a truth to base an argument on. Rather than provide proof of UFO's you blame the US government for you not being able to prove your theory.
The semi-official COMETA report from French military and political officials made this same point. So, when you assert that 'hoaxers' exist as the cause for some phenomena, I suggest you contrast such with the proven fact that the US government has little credibility in this and many other matters. Life is often a game of poker and you have no choice but to choos one liar over others.
Just like the brainless 9/11 possee. They use the fact the US government sucks like a cheap whore and has similar morals to one. On top of this reasonable fact and all the stuff that is provable (Iran in the '50's, The False Cold War, refusing to broker peace in Afghanistan when the Russians wanted to withdraw, destabilisation of democratic Latin American reigemes, WoMD, the list goes on and on), they build little fantasies and use the US's track record to insist that IF it was untruthful in x example (say the False Cold War), it must be untruthful about UFO's and 9/11.
They ignore that the ones that are provable are provable, and the ones that aren't aren't, insisting that it is the US governmrent's fault they can't prove their monmanacal conspiracy theories.
But meta, you obviously like believing this stuff, so I doubt argment will pursuade you otherwise.
-
bluesapphire
The thing that makes me skeptical about this story is the fact that out of all of the military personnel who worked on the site, only ONE has made comment and it was only to their family members? Yeah, right.
And also, someone out there had to have kept a picture if it really happened.
And why New Mexico? And what happened to all the other flying saucers that visited New Mexico?
What would the government have to gain by keeping this a secret, anyway?
-
-
metatron
As usual, Abaddon, your post is loaded with insults, ad hominem remarks and ungrounded assertions
about what's been said. I've come to ignore your posts because they exalt contention over the logic
you claim to prize. Should you change this behavior, I may decide to respond.
Thank you
metatron
-
Nathan Natas
Metatron, I personally enjoy reading about unusual events and borderline science. It's a pleasant diversion, I think; like a slice of ice cream cake. Not good for a steady diet, perhaps, but sometimes pleasant.
I found another site that has a link to a map. it is here: http://www.aztecufo.com/crash.htm
I haven't spent a lot of time studying the UFO phenomenon, so I really did a double-take when I saw that the person who first alerted the world to the stories of flying saucers was named Scully. Is there a historical Mulder too? Enquiring minds want to know...
