BROTHEL AT BROOKLYN BETHEL IN 1930s

by badboy 14 Replies latest jw friends

  • metatron
    metatron

    I think Barbara Grizzuti Harrison referred to this rumor somewhere. I would not be surprized if some

    informal arrangement existed back then. The organization in Rutherford's day was quite different in

    private moral matters. I think there was a C.O. who openly got a divorce ( Mayberry?) and others

    who walked away from marriages. As Farkel has pointed out, there were some very suspicious

    relationships in the Society back then. There were odd situations in which a brother committed

    fornication with a sister and was told to go apologize to her! Keep in mind that you also had long

    term gays running the organization, too.

    metatron

  • badboy
    badboy

    BARBARA GRIZZUTI WAS THE SOURCE, I BELIEVE.

    SOURCE;FREEMINDS

  • BizzyBee
    BizzyBee

    Excerpt from Barbara G. Harrison's book, Visions of Glory: A History and a Memory of Jehovah's Witnesses:

    "We at Bethel used to point with pride to the fact that while missionaries of "false religion" traveled in first-class comfort to their assignments, our missionaries were sent third class and, like a religious Peace Corps, lived like the people among whom they served. It never occurred to us to worry that Knorr traveled first class. We were an adaptive group.

    " The phenomenon of denying the evidence, and making no connections or faulty connections, is common to all people whose need to believe overcomes their rational judgment. Faced with the fact that some of their leaders have been suspected of hitting the bottle with a passion, confronted with the rumors that a small brothel was once maintained on Willow Street in Columbia Heights for the entertainment of Bethelites around mid-century, Witnesses' eyes glaze, and they will either refuse to countenance the charges or stoutly maintain that God's servants are "imperfect vessels.”

    " Time speaks softly of the dead. In the case of the Witnesses, it is often mute. The Witnesses have notoriously short and selective memories. The Society smothers unsavory parts of its past under the blanket of its current preoccupations. During the 1940s and early '50s, when I was a Witness and a member of the headquarters staff, it was as if Charles Taze Russell had never existed. This vivid, controversial personality had at best a shadow life; he was seldom, if ever, spoken of. Any discussion of him was likely to be aborted with the phrase "We are not followers of any man." The Society does not talk unkindly of its dead; it doesn't talk of them. It was not until the mid and late '50s that edited accounts of Russell's life and activities began to appear in Watchtower histories. Merciful time (with help from revisionist historians) has blurred Russell's difficulties. In Watchtower histories, the man who died on October 31, 1916, with $200 in a personal bank account-having invested his money in the Society in return for voting shares that gave him complete financial control-goes down as a simple, homey man."

    I loved this book. I was a shunned apostate for nearly ten years, never having contact with any other ex-witness until this book came out. I wrote to Barbara and she wrote back to me, wishing me a good life. I've never understood why this book hasn't been read by more ex-witnesses.

  • badboy
    badboy

    WAS THIS BROTHEL IN A FORMER CHAPEL OF BABYLON THE GREAT?

  • aSphereisnotaCircle
    aSphereisnotaCircle
    I loved this book. I was a shunned apostate for nearly ten years, never having contact with any other ex-witness until this book came out. I wrote to Barbara and she wrote back to me, wishing me a good life. I've never understood why this book hasn't been read by more ex-witnesses.

    I am currently reading this book and injoying it too.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit