The wanderer
I could show enough evidence regarding this matter
however, with the reply's on this topic I seriously
doubtconsideration. that it would be taken into
And this is why the paranormal belietiving community are ridiculed by mainstream science. Rather than present evidence, they make excuses why they cannot prove their beliefs.
The Borg blame apostates for not believing in their rubbish, and then negate the existence of such nay-sayers by making the fact apostates are dubious about the Borg's claims as a reason for not even engaging in a dialog with apostates.
You seem to still follow the same toxic thinking pattern.
I provided neutral, unbiased and creditable
sources.
But you have not proved the existence of paranormal phenomena outside the minds of those that claim such phenomena exists. And it is YOUR problem you are unable to prove YOUR beliefs. Present facts, or take responsibility for not being able to prove your beliefs rather than this childish whining.
Warlock
I would invite Abaddon and Alan F. to my haunted office, but it seems like the spirit(s) have left, with the death of the property owners wife. They have been gone about a year or so.
Ah, so you're telling me you can't prove it either. Don't take it personally Warlock, no one else can prove it. Quitw why you have you make an excuse ("I could have proved ghosties but they went away") I don't know. I don't care if you believe in them. I just want to be clear that me not believing them is entirely due to the failure of those who do believe in such things to prove they actually exist. Not my problem.
Perhaps Mr. Randi is one of those, whose mere presence does not allow for, or blocks, any type of psychic activity.
Another excuse. Did the bad doggie eat the paranormal homework?
metatron
If we acknowledge that intuition exists and has real practical effects ( as outcomes), then it is reasonable to think of it as part of a spectrum of information gained by means we cannot reduce.
Ah, so you think intution and imaginatron are easily distinguishable.
Well, when you present hard proof of paranormal claims, you can also present hard proof that intuition and imagination are easily distinguishable.
Let me try it this way: An idea comes crashing into your head from out of nowhere. It helps you with your job or hobby or investments. You accept that intuition exists and appreciate it.
Yeah, but that's how the brain works, or at least how we perceive it working. Our brain putting together information it already holds in the background and presenting a new angle, solution or innovation based upon that pre-existing data is one thing.
somebody claims that that they can predict tomorrow's lotto numbers, you reject it as "psychic".
Well, that claim is another thing entirely different from intuition; it involves the brain putting together unknown data that it could not have access to and being able to use it. I wouldn't reject them because they claimed they were a 'phychic'. I would reject such claims as they wouldn't be able to do it. By all means, prove me wrong.
