Old Testament figure named on 2600-year-old tablet

by whereami 13 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • whereami
    whereami

    I wonder if this will do anything to help settle the 607 vs' 587 debate.

    THE British Museum yesterday hailed a discovery within a clay tablet in its collection as a breakthrough for biblical archeology - proof of the accuracy of the Old Testament.

    The cuneiform inscription in a tablet dating from 595BC has been deciphered for the first time - revealing a reference to an official at the court of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, that proves the historical existence of a figure mentioned in the Book of Jeremiah.

    It is rare evidence in a non-biblical source of a real person, other than kings, featured in the Bible.

    The tablet names a Babylonian officer called Nebo-Sarsekim who, according to Jeremiah 39 was present in 587BC when Nebuchadnezzar "marched against Jerusalem with his whole army and laid siege to it".

    The cuneiform inscription records how Nebo-Sarsekim lavished a gift of gold on the Temple of Esangila in the fabled city of Babylon, where, at least in folk tradition, Nebuchadnezzar is credited with building the Hanging Gardens, one of the Seven Wonders of the World.

    British Museum staff are excited by the discovery.

    Irving Finkel, assistant keeper in the Department of the Middle East, said: "A mundane commercial transaction takes its place as a primary witness to one of the turning points in Old Testament history.

    "This is a tablet that deserves to be famous."

    The discovery was made by Michael Jursa, associate professor at the University of Vienna, on a research trip to the museum.

    "It's very exciting and very surprising," he said.

    "Finding something like this tablet, where we see a person mentioned in the Bible making an everyday payment to the temple in Babylon and quoting the exact date, is quite extraordinary."

    Since 1991, Dr Jursa has been visiting the museum to study a collection of more than 100,000 inscribed tablets - the world's largest holdings.

    Cuneiform is the oldest known form of writing. During its 3000-year history, it was used to write about 15 languages, including Babylonian, Assyrian, Hittite and Urartian.

    There are only a small number of scholars worldwide who can read cuneiform script.

    One of them is Dr Jursa, who yesterday said the British Museum tablet was so well preserved that it took him just a couple of minutes to decipher.

    This one - which is 5.5cm wide - was acquired by the British Museum in 1920, "but no one realised the connection," Dr Jursa said.

    "They didn't really read it."

    It was unearthed from the ancient city of Sippar, where there was a huge sun temple, about 2km from Baghdad.

    On hearing of the discovery yesterday, Geza Vermes, the eminent emeritus professor of Jewish studies at the University of Oxford, said such a discovery revealed that "the Biblical story is not altogether invented".

    "This will be interesting for religious people as much as historians," he said.

    The Times, London, in The Australian

    Here's the link http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22060312-2,00.html

  • Gopher
    Gopher

    Of course the tablet here mentioned didn't say "595 BC" on it !

    So the Watchtower-defenders will say that the British Museum's dating of the fragment is in error. They'd just push it back 20 years to 615 BCE to suit their version of chronology.

  • cultswatter
    cultswatter

    Ya, keep 1914 at all costs even if it means lying

  • Arthur
    Arthur
    I wonder if this will do anything to help settle the 607 vs' 587 debate.

    Has any of the documented evidence of the holocaust changed the mind of holocaust deniers?

  • moomanchu
    moomanchu

    That is good news.

    I have always hoped that one day there would be a discovery where there would be no possible way for

    the watchtower to deny their errors (lies).

    Then the prediction they always make about other religons would come true for them " in an instant sudden destruction".

    I wonder if these scholars realize the impact they can have on people (and a certain cult) today?

    Do they know the noteriety they could achive? It would be a worthwhile effort to let them know.

    If they knew they could become famous for debunking a myth like 1914, they might attack these tablets with greater zeal.

    I wonder if the TV show myth busters could help out with 1914. lol

  • yaddayadda
    yaddayadda

    This is very interesting.

    Maybe I'm thick but how would this new discovery lend support to the argument that the 607 date for Jerusalem's destruction is wrong?

    Yadda

  • Leolaia
    Leolaia

    It's not a debate so nothing new would really change their minds, when they already can exclude all the evidence that already exists.

  • candidlynuts
    candidlynuts

    i agree leolaia..jesus himself could come down here and tell the watchtower leaders a bunch of truths.......they'd disfellowship him and keep on with the status quo.

  • moomanchu
    moomanchu

    I have always hoped that one day there would be a discovery where there would be no possible way for

    the watchtower to deny their errors (lies).

    I did not say this was that discovery.

  • Deputy Dog
    Deputy Dog

    yaddayadda

    Maybe I'm thick but how would this new discovery lend support to the argument that the 607 date for Jerusalem's destruction is wrong?

    Here is an article that may help.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/07/11/ntablet111.xml

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit