Ore. court rules against Mormon church's effort to keep finances secret

by jgnat 15 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • jgnat
    jgnat

    This find is courtesy of our very own poster, Gretchen956.

    Here is the link: http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_071207_news_mormon_church_finances_.6a24f7fd.html

    Here is the article:

    Ore. court rules against Mormon church's effort to keep finances secret
    08:55 AM PDT on Thursday, July 12, 2007
    Associated Press

    PORTLAND, Ore. -- The Oregon Supreme Court rejected an effort by the Mormon church to withhold financial information from the lawyers for a man who claims a "home teacher" frequently molested him about 20 years ago.
    Despite the legal defeat, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints did not immediately release the detailed financial information about its net worth, The Oregonian newspaper reported.
    Kelly Clark, an attorney for the Oregon man suing the church, said it would be good for a jury to have the information before considering his request for $45 million in punitive damages. A trial is scheduled for Aug. 6.
    "A jury needs to know the entire financial context to know whether a punitive award is too much or sufficient or not enough," Clark said.
    The LDS church sought emergency relief from a trial court order to turn over the financial information, but the Oregon Supreme Court late Monday rejected the appeal. The pretrial decision was reached on narrow pretrial grounds and doesn't mean the court would not ultimately side with the church's position that the Constitution protects its right to keep financial information private.
    "The church is considering its position," Stephen F. English, the LDS church's lead Portland attorney, told the newspaper. "The church respects the rule of law but has profound constitutional concerns based on its constitutional right to protect the free expression of its religion."
    The LDS church has not released financial information since 1959.
    "It's the secret of secrets," said Timothy N. Kosnoff, a Seattle attorney who sought the information in 2001 on behalf of a former Oregon man who claimed he was sexually abused by an LDS Sunday school teacher.
    Kosnoff never got the information because the church agreed to pay his client $3 million.
    The latest bid to expose the church's net worth stems from a lawsuit filed last year that accuses Kenneth I. Johnson Jr. of molesting a Beaverton youth as often as twice a week in the late 1980s.
    Johnson, who has denied the accusation, was the boy's home teacher, a church-sanctioned lay official authorized to provide educational and religious guidance, according to the suit.
    English said Johnson was acting as a family friend, not a church official, and LDS church officials did not know about the alleged abuse while it was happening.

  • Gretchen956
    Gretchen956

    Thanks for posting this for me while I figure out why I'm having trouble. I'm hopeful this will set some sort of a precedence. Be nice to have the WTS finances part of the public record and it would be especially helpful to juries trying to award damages in child molestation trials.

    Sherry

  • candidlynuts
    candidlynuts

    that sounds like a good precedent. once it's in the court records it will be public?

    i hope the us gov't makes all religons give public financial statements. why is it freedom of religious expression to hide their assets?

    i dont know about the average mormon but i betcha if it was the watchtower , members would crap when they saw how much money it had and where it goes. just the australian financial release shocked me.. MILLIONS of dollars, all sent to brooklyn, and just over 1,000 (ONE THOUSAND) listed as actual charitiable spending.

    i say blow all religions cover on their finances. then tax them! HA

  • johnny cip
    johnny cip

    seems like the courts are getting fed-up. with these church secrets. this could SPELL BIG TROLUBLE FOR THE WTS. and all other churches. i sure hope so... john

  • Gretchen956
    Gretchen956

    I wouldn't be surprise if this one isn't headed for the Supreme Court. They usually side with the churches. I think if this information comes out for different religions everyone would be shocked. I don't think any of them will want this to lose this one. When I read this my first impression was, this could be HUGE.

    We shall wait and we shall see.

    Sherry

  • zack
    zack

    First Amendment grounds for non disclosure of financial information for an entity that receives tax-exemption has always seemed a flimsy argument. Why should any entity that is subsidized by all tax payers receive a privilege such as this? I wish the tax law would change: if you want exemption then full disclosure is in order.

  • BrendaCloutier
    BrendaCloutier

    Way to go Oregon!

  • sf
    sf

    Ya know, I really think it's only a matter of time...

    sKally

  • moshe
    moshe

    Joseph Smith would be proud how well his scam turned out.

  • reneeisorym
    reneeisorym

    all non-profit orgs should have to disclose their worth so that the people donating will know where everything goes.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit