Two things about the UN scandal that did it for me...
1. The hypocrisy. For years I heard scathing talks about how Christendom was doomed because of her ties to the governmental authorities. Per WT doctrine, the book of Revelation is specifically speaking of the UN when talking about the Wild Beast and its image. Why would the WTS come anywhere close to associating with the Wild Beast or its image?
2. The denial. The story was broken to the world through the English newspaper, The Guardian. Granted, the reporter wasn't a fan of the WTS or JWs but that didn't change the facts that he printed about the status of the WTS being an NGO associated with the DPI of the UN. Within hours, not even 24 hours, the WTS had disassociated itself from anything to do with the UN. Then they came up with some bullshit story to cover their tracks. Their story denied that they ever compromised their principles. So why did they see the need to distance themselvs from the controversy?
I know this gets harped on from time to time but I feel that it is very, very, very important that we use the correct terminology when speaking of the UN scandal. The WTS was never a member of the UN. Only national governments can be members of the UN.
If we run to all the JWs we know and try to tell them that the WTS was a member of the UN, it can actually backfire on us. It can make us look uneducated on the subject. Since JWs are conditioned to treat all negative press about the WTS as lies and propaganda, it would be easy for them to ignore the subject as the ramblings of deranged, lying apostates bent on spreading lies about the WTS.