ROFLMAO!
A New Website
by Kent 41 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
Sad emo
Let's say a million dollars!
I think you're selling yourself a bit short there - I'd ask for at least double that amount lol!
-
Kent
Does anyone have the ability to write some articles for The Wichpower site?
If so, please contact me!
-
-
legalchickie
I just signed up today but can't figure out how to post anything or join discussion. i have set up my biography but can't figure out how to talk to anyone. Help?
-
eclipse
chickie, you just did
this is joining the discussion..
.just click active topics, scroll through the pages, click on a topic that interests you, read the posts if any,
and then click reply at the bottom if you have something to add...and you just did that!
WELCOME!
-
Mum
Kent! How wonderful to see you back here. You should visit more often.
I'm going to check out your new site now.
SandraC
-
Kent
I did look at www.pornolize.com, but that wasn't any good, I believe. Just adding "bad words" into the text here and there isn't what I'm looking for.
I've written many letters about pornolizer's short-sighted contrivances. Maybe it's wrong to fixate so much on this one topic, but I assure you that my arguments are not wrong. Before I launch into my main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Education without action creates frustration, while action without education leads to solecism, and (2) as a result of that, pornolizer relies on stichomancy to "prove" that it's inappropriate to teach children right from wrong. Now that you know where I stand on those issues, I can safely say that it has stated that it's okay for it to indulge its every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. That's just pure blackguardism. Well, in pornolizer's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that pornolizer managed to convince a bunch of detestable lowbrows of one sort or another to help it produce nothing but filth. What was the quid pro quo there? Well, while you're deliberating over that, let me ask you another question: What in perdition does it think it's doing? Now, not to bombard you with too many questions, but its inclinations will have consequences -- very serious consequences. And we ought to begin doing something about that. Pornolizer's statements such as "It's okay if pornolizer's projects initially cause our quality of life to degrade because 'sometime', 'someone' will do 'something' 'somehow' to counteract that trend" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual. As it turns out, some people say that that isn't sufficient evidence to prove that pornolizer is secretly scheming to implement a slaphappy parody of justice called "pornolizer-ism". And I must agree; one needs much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there, for anyone who isn't afraid to look at it. Just look at the way that before pornolizer initiated a McCarthyism flap to help promote its witless conjectures, people everywhere were expected to enhance people's curiosity, critical acumen, and aesthetic sensitivity. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that if pornolizer's thinking were cerebral rather than glandular, it wouldn't consider it such a good idea to grasp at straws, trying to find increasingly materialistic ways to abandon me on a desert island.
The key to pornolizer's soul is its longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. It dreads the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition. As a result, pornolizer is out to elevate its wisecracks to prominence as epistemological principles. And when we play its game, we become accomplices. If pornolizer isn't brain-damaged, I don't know who is. Pornolizer's a psychologically defective organization. It's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath.
If some people are offended by my mentioning that pornolizer's analects are grounded in phony acts of kindness, then so be it. Unlike pornolizer, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if -- and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty" -- it were not actually responsible for trying to push our efforts two steps backward, then I'd stop saying that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to warn the public against those stingy roustabouts whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil, but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. We were not put here to exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation, as pornolizer might maintain. You might think that anyone who doesn't know that pornolizer is disruptive must be inhabiting a different world. Well, if that's the case, then I'm afraid pornolizer's vassals must have spent the past month on Mars. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, challenge you to ponder this subject with the broadest vision possible.
-
Kent
There is quite a few new pages there now. This one ius fun. Maybe someone copuld call the boyz and tape the conversation? I can publish the fun you know :) http://www.watchtower.no/call.htm
-
Nosferatu
LOL @ Jesus is coming!
I REALLY wish this site was around when my heart was no longer in the JW religion. Thank you for the good laugh!