Hi there cultswatter. This will be (hopefully) my only response to this thread.
Having met the writing dept, I can tell you that they are not nearly as clever to insert subliminal words. In your example, the letters aren't even in order. To me my friend, this is the equivelant of an ink blot test. You saw what you were looking for. (sort of)
The same goes for the art dept. I think the pictures and drawings are horribly manipulative and graphic. They are designed at times to shock you. But no one in the Art Dept puts in subliminal messaging in the art. These guys are volunteers. They like to draw. The pictures like the articles come from pre approved ideas and concepts of the governing body. THEN they are sent back and worked up. Then the articles and artwork get final approval.
It takes a lot more knowhow and technology to do as you suggest cultswatter. In my opinion, it is posts like this that actually discredit the legitimate work of exposing Jehovah's Witnesses (the governing body esp) for what they really are.
Consider, JW's have all sorts of pedophiles running loose. Their main teaching of the importance of the date of 1914 is linked to Egyptian pyramids and a totally false, intellectually dishonest date for the fall of Jerusalem. (607 is not true for you lurkers.) While condemning anyone who would get a political card in Malawai during the 1970's as disloyal to Jehovah by aligning oneself with the world, the governing body turns around and for an entire decade (90's) is a "card carrying member" of the United Nations. They are responsible for thousands of deaths while they themselves hypocritically break this very same "principle" when convenient for them.
And while all this is going on, you are looking for the word "baseless" in a WT article paragraph? Such trivial fiction makes the governing body claim that "apostates" are nuts and full of lies credible.
So I have to go on record for the sake of honesty cultswatter and say while I respect your right to believe this if you wish, you are totally 100% wrong in this assertion.