Sure 007. Of course it does. Maybe you're drinking too many martinis.
LMAO!
by Witness 007 37 Replies latest watchtower bible
Sure 007. Of course it does. Maybe you're drinking too many martinis.
LMAO!
testing
whoa! i finally did it. you guys are in trouble now. lol
Since it appears that it was suppose to be an asterisk, I'd be more apt to blame a bad character mapping, rather than a deliberate insert of that icon. Do asterisks appear in other articles?
I'd love to see this too, but it sounds more like a corrupted font file than something deliberate.
Press "Print Screen" on your keyboard...
Then load up "paint"...
Click EDIT ... PASTE
then save the file.
Upload it to somewhere like imageshack or www.tinypic.com
then paste the link here.
GOOD LUCK
I see an asterisk. Are you ok???
changeling
My 2001 CD has a sad face instead of a star like this article. Im not crazy I even printed it out..theres the sad face! Does anyone else have i....2001 version!
I have the 2001, 2004 and 2006 CD-ROMs.........I don't see any 'sad' face there.
Not that we don't believe you. It likely is a computer language problem as stated. An appropriate placement nonetheless. If you can do the upload it would be nice to see.
Jeff
***
MultipleArticles***When we last discussed voluntary sterilization in this column* most physicians considered the procedure irreversible and thus permanent. However, medical developments in the last decade have changed the situation somewhat. For example, PopulationReports (November-December 1983, Johns Hopkins University) says about vasectomies: "In recent reports reversals have restored patency—that is, sperm have been found in the ejaculate—in 67 to 100 percent of men. Functional success—that is, pregnancies among the wives of men who have had reversals—has ranged from 16 to 85 percent." New surgical procedures and methods of implanting temporary blocks are also pointed to as indicating that reversal success will yet increase.
I copied this from the sent items preview pane of the 2001 WT. The "sad face" is what apperars in the article but it is copying as an asterik. Any ideas why?