The point I am making is Jehovah's Witnesses now days are so critical of anyone making a biblical decision based on emotions rather then facts. They are very critical of other groups claiming such personal communication from God. They mark those groups as part of Babylon the Great deserving of death at the end of the world.
I sincerely doubt that most of modern day Jehovah's Witnesses realize that their faith rest on a personal experience rather then what they demand and judge other groups for not having factual biblical proof.
Rutherford hadn't come to power at this time, but later when he did he vulcanized these early doctrinal points and was very ruff on those that disagreed. Russell on the other hand, concerned himself more with building charcter. Later there would be a division over promoting Rutherfords ruff treatment pushings conformity rather then Russell kinder gentler approach. Which by the way created another new doctrine based on personal experience call the "evil slave class".