Hi
I rang London Bethel and asked to speak to someone about the recent case in the British press about a JW child sex offender. The lady at reception asked if I was a Witness. I replied that I can't see what that has got to do with it I just would like to ask some questions. I pushed the point with her as to what difference it would make as to whether I was or not and she eventually in a fluster just put me on to piped music before a gentleman at the Media Dept answered.
I explained to him that I was not a JW but my parents were.
The gentleman told me that Porter was removed from being an elder as soon as it 'came to light'.
Porter is not an elder or a ministerial servant and will not be in the future in line with the 1991 WT information. ( I don't know what article)
I asked him how come the holy spirit appointed Porter as an elder after he had committed the crimes. Surely the holy spirit must have known he was an abuser and yet still appointed him.
The gentleman said that the qualifications in 1 Tim 3 and Titus 2 are inspired by holy spirit and therefore if it appears that a man fulfills those qualifications then it can be said that he is appointed by holy spirit.
I said that seems a bit of a cop out as following that arguement if any one does anything that is following something said in the Bible they could be viewed as appointed by holy spirit. Also I said I don't think that's how my parents view it. I am sure they view it as it's said i.e. an elder is appointed by holy spirit.
He then said categorically "we do not believe any divine inspiration is involved" in the appointment of elders.
That last bit is news to me.
Thanks
Thomas Covenant