Read this PR piece about Jehovah's Witnesses (respond if you like)

by Gopher 36 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Gopher
    Gopher

    I just had to send a letter to the editor (see my next post) after the Waynesville, North Carolina local newspaper published this lovely little puff piece about Jehovah's Witnesses.

    The last parts about blood transfusion and the "loving practice" of disfellowshipping were so absurd!

    Link to the article: CLICK HERE

    Who are the Jehovah's Witnesses?

    Kenneth M Johnson - Special to the Mountaineer

    The current location of Jehovah's Witnesses in Haywood County is just off U.S. 19-23, between Clyde and Waynesville on Kingdom Hall Road.

    Those in the congregation refer to their church building as Kingdom Hall, which houses two congregations: The Waynesville meeting, which convenes at 10 a.m. each Sunday, and the Clyde meeting, which meets at 1:30 p.m. each Sunday.

    In the near future, they plan to relocate on Counsel Place, off of East Street in Waynesville. Their quick-build construction will enable an all-volunteer labor force over a weekend or a period of four days to construct the new Kingdom Hall.

    Elders, who manage the Kingdom Hall services, are unpaid, but circuit and district overseers receive a small financial living allowance.

    All baptized Witnesses are regarded as ordained ministers, and are expected to provide religious instruction to others. Males are encouraged to qualify to become elders. Teaching takes place in the Hall; preaching in house-to-house visitations. Within local congregations, the role of women is minimal in terms of responsibility, but they carry out a large proportion of the preaching work.

    Attending the two-hour teaching service of the Waynesville Jehovah's Witnesses meeting provides one with a unique perspective on religion in Haywood County.

    Jehovah's Witnesses do not claim to be part of the traditional church, although they accept the New Testament as part of their sacred writings. Their Sunday meeting is not called worship but simply meeting. No offering is received.

    During the first hour recently, a visiting elder from Mountain City, Ga., lectured on the question, Does Your Hope Rest on Science or the Bible? Tom Hoy listed both the virtues and the vices of modern science, concluding that the Bible offers many of our scientific conclusions. He cited Genesis 2:19 as the beginning of science. Throughout his 45-minute talk, Hoy referred to God as Jehovah God or Jehovah.

    In their large-print song book, Sing Praise to Jehovah, one noted that all of the songs are based upon some biblical text and are written by Jehovah's Witnesses. Texts and music arrangements are both melodic and singable.

    After a standup break and another song, the second hour was devoted to a Bible study, that Sunday on the theme, Keep Conquering the Evil with the Good. (Romans 12:21)

    Joe Michael, an elder in the Waynesville meeting, presided over this session, assisted in the reading of each paragraph in the Watchtower study guide by Boris Jekic. The moderator asked related questions after paragraphs were read, which were then answered by different people in the meeting, men and women and even some children each one being recognized by the moderator with the title Brother or Sister. Michael's memory was impressive, including the surname of practically all of the participants.

    While women aren't allowed to teach,Michael said after the meeting, they may respond to questions related to the subject matter.

    Only one religious symbol was visible in the Hall, a verse from Zephaniah 1:14, The great day of Jehovah is near, which was printed in large letters across the wall behind the platform.

    The people who gathered in the local Kingdom Hall wore their Sunday best, the ladies in attractive dresses and the men in suits, coats and ties.

    The visiting elder closed the meeting with prayer.

    How are Jehovah's Witnesses sometimes misunderstood? Tom Uchtmann, another elder in the Waynesville meeting, answered in a later conversation.

    Some people do not understand that we are a Christian religion; we do acknowledge Jesus' sacrificial death as the means to our salvation, Uchtmann said.

    Uchtmann also mentioned that, contrary to the beliefs of some, an unlimited number of people will be saved on the Day of Judgment not just 144,000.

    As to the Jehovah's Witnesses position toward governments, Uchtmann said, We believe in subjection to all governments in obedience to their laws, as long as they do not conflict with God's laws.

    On two other controversial matters, he said, Jehovah's Witnesses do not believe it is scriptural to mix Christian teaching with non-Christian teaching.

    Holiday events are not part of our religious tradition, he said.

    Those in the church are also opposed to blood transfusions.

    We believe there are acceptable alternatives to blood transfusions, said Uchtmann. For this reason, Jehovah's Witnesses respectfully decline this service based upon our understanding of biblical teaching.

    Those who fail to follow the church's teachings are temporarily ousted through an arrangement called disfellowship.

    Disfellowship is a loving arrangement whereby any member who commits a serious transgression of the scriptural law and refuses help can be put out of the organization, said Michael. We'd hope such action would cause that member to repent; whereupon their membership is restored.

  • Gopher
    Gopher

    I encourage anyone who feels like it -- click on the link above and send a letter to the editor.

    Here's the one I sent:

    After having spent decades as a Jehovah's Witness, I find this article to be incomplete. It may not be possible in a brief piece to present the full story, at least one aspect of this article cries out for a balanced comment.

    The Witness practice of disfellowshipping is not based simply on failure to follow the church's teachings (as stated in the article), but as the church itself says, failure to be repentant. A group of 3 elders meet as a committee and confront the alleged offender to try to get a confession of wrong and judge, in secret, whether the person is in their opinion worthy of remaining in the congregation. If the person is judged unworthy, and no successful appeal is made, the name of the unworthy person is announced at a midweek meeting as no longer being a Witness. This serves as notice for all members to avoid that person totally, not saying hello, not having any fellowship whatsoever.

    This procedure is not found in the Bible, but is taught by the Watchtower Society under which the Witnesses operate. It effectively controls the flow of any critical or opposing information from former to current members. Their organization wants total information control. No independent thought whatsoever is allowed, under the threat of censure or expulsion.

    Far from being a "loving arrangement", disfellowshipping or shunning and the social isolation it creates is among the most cruel ways you can treat a fellow human. It has broken up families and has ruined lives.

    Ask yourself, exactly whom did Jesus shun and avoid when he was here on earth? If you can't think of anybody, then ask yourself how Jehovah's Witnesses can call themselves Christian, at least in this aspect.

  • Clam
    Clam

    Nice one Gopher.

    Does this seem a reasonable communication? - -

    Your article Who Are The Jehovah's Witnesses offered a cosy overview of what I consider to be an unpleasant little cult. Regardless of their teachings, which focus more on the whims of the Watchtower magazine editors rather than the Bible, the organisation needs to be carefully scrutinised by anyone considering an association with them. The internet contains a wealth of information, but why not read Crisis of Conscience by former Watchtower supremo Raymond Franz? Once a member of the Jehovah's Witness elite Governing Body, Franz exposes the cult for what it is. There are many reasons to steer clear of this group, including their inhuman shunning policy and their lethal and confused blood doctrine. I sincerely wish that your article hasn't assisted in giving them the veneer of respectability they strive to cultivate.

    Yours etc. . .

  • Awakened07
    Awakened07

    -Maybe I'm misunderstanding the brother, but:

    We believe there are acceptable alternatives to blood transfusions, said Uchtmann. For this reason, Jehovah's Witnesses respectfully decline this service based upon our understanding of biblical teaching.

    In other words: "For this reason [that there are acceptable alternatives to blood transfusions], Jehovah's Witnesses respectfully decline this service based upon our understanding of biblical teaching."

    -Am I to understand that this brother then feels it would be wrong to follow this biblical teaching if there weren't any alternatives? And what about those JWs who had to make this decision at a time when alternatives [supported by the Watchtower] were non-existent?

    Seems to me this is said in this way in order to give the outward impression that makes people go: "Oh - it's because there are viable alternatives. Then I'm OK with their no blood teaching."

    As a whole, the article is rather typical of these kinds of articles when an outsider goes to a single meeting and reports about it. The initial impression will after all usually be good.

  • Maddie
    Maddie

    Gopher I read your post with interest because it has gone through my mind several times recently to write a letter to our local newspaper exposing the JW's for their disfellowshipping policy and how cruel it is. It may stop a great many people from getting inolved in the future. What do you think?

    Maddie

  • snowbird
    snowbird

    Ask yourself, exactly whom did Jesus shun and avoid when he was here on earth? If you can't think of anybody, then ask yourself how Jehovah's Witnesses can call themselves Christian, at least in this aspect.

    That's a good one, Gopher. Here in the Bible Belt where is Jesus is revered, that should cause many to take notice. I think I'll fire off a letter stressing their downgrading of Jesus.

    Sylvia

  • greendawn
    greendawn

    That was good anti witnessing Gopher. That newspaper article contains typical JW propaganda and evades many uncomfortable facts, typical JW PR practice.

    There is no Biblical ban on saving lives through blood transfusions even the religious Jews to whom the Mosaic law applies don't see it that way to them saving lives is above the law. The JWs don't have as much common sense!

    Also there is no suitable blood substitute and thousands of JWs died over the years by refusing blood while the recent substantial loosening of the blood ban shows that the JW leadership is playing with lives. Many would have survived had the current more free policy existed in the past.

  • snowbird
    snowbird

    I sent my letter. If I get a response, I will share it with you guys.

    Sylvia

  • rebel8
    rebel8

    Edited to make it more accurate! :)

    "We believe there are acceptable alternatives to blood transfusions," said Uchtmann. "Even though medical science has proven that there are medical situations when nonblood alternatives are completely ineffective, and we've seen fellow cultists die for refusing it, we still tell reporters and other noncultists that alternatives are available. This makes us look better to the general public and hopefully improves recruitment efforts. We certainly cannot allow reporters like yourself to tell the truth about us because that would be letting Satan win."

    "For this reason, Jehovah's Witnesses respectfully decline this service based upon our understanding of biblical teaching. By 'respectfully decline', we mean lying, kidnapping, sneaking, and defying court orders. One need only utilize Google to discover our history is fraught with telling kids and adults to lie about their medical symptoms and to pull out the transfusion needle when the doctor isn't looking.

    "We also encourage people to escape from the hospital and for parents to take their children out of the country to avoid complying with court orders. We have even had members lovingly surround the bed of a fellow cultist to block the attempts of doctors and nurses to administer court-ordered blood. This is all due to our misplaced faith in a bunch of paranoid uneducated men in Crooklyn.

    "We ensure our members comply with this by indoctrinating them with decades of intentional misrepresentation of medical facts, the threat of 'loving disfellowship' (oh wait, did I say that? I meant, 'disassociation'.) and a gory death in the immediate future by an omniscient ogre. Because that sometimes is not enough, we have a team of men harass the patient and medical staff while in the midst of the crisis. It's very effective. And loving, of course."

  • freetosee
    freetosee

    To me the article sounds like it came directly from the WT PR department! I wonder what connection the writer has with the society?
    I think its good to reply as you and others did and will do so myself later.
    fts

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit