I posted a link to this site http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html under politics. I got to thinking how interesting it would be to do something similar here to get a profile of posters by various categories. I have no idea how difficult it might be technically but it would be fascinating. To me anyway. You?
JWD posters survey for a group profile?
by Gregor 15 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
AK - Jeff
Here is where I landed - it even surprised me.
Former North Carolina Senator John Edwards (D)
70.00% matchYou are number 1,016,709 to use the Candidate Calculator.
-
nvrgnbk
I think it's a great idea, Gregor.
-
eclipse
Is this only for american / USA posters?
-
nvrgnbk
Is this only for american / USA posters?
Djiboutian posters would be permitted as well.
-
eclipse
Your Results
You planned to vote for Undecided. Based on your responses, your top candidate for 2008 is below.
Your Top Match
Ohio Representative Dennis Kucinich (D)
88.89% matchYou are number 1,017,610 to use the Candidate Calculator.
I had to click on the topics so that I could form a more informed opinion.
I just looked over his campaign website, and I would probably vote for him if I was american.
-
purplesofa
Your Results
You planned to vote for Undecided. Based on your responses, your top candidate for 2008 is below.
Your Top Match Former Alaska Senator Mike Gravel (D)
81.82% matchYou are number 1,017,866 to use the Candidate Calculator.
I must like him cuz we have almost the same last name.!!!!!!
he looks like he is trying to figure out where he is
purps
-
Paralipomenon
Ohio Representative Dennis Kucinich (D)
84.62% match
You are number 1,018,065 to use the Candidate Calculator.
What's it like in Ohio? Do I have to move? -
Gregor
Just to clarify my thread. Your poll results are interesting but I was using the site as an example of the kind of polling calculator I think would be fun for this site on many topics, not just politics. I guess I'm asking if anyone has the tech. knowhow to set it up. We could all contribute suggestions for topics, i.e. age group, sex, atheist/believer, DF'd or DA'd, fading, lurking, etc etc The results would not have to identify individuals, just group percentages in each catagory.
-
AK - Jeff
That's an interesting idea, Gregor. We could ranked on some sort of relative continuum? Is that the idea - as opposed to this profile which identifies the person with an individual?
Jeff