If someone is 'Sincere' about their belief or beliefs in 'something' does that make their actions and the repurcussions of their actions excusable and their right to continue in that belief also excusable?
Mr Bush sincerely believed that God told him to invade Iraq.
Mr Blair said he 'sincerely believed' that was the right thing to do.
Apologists and semi apologists for the WT and misled members of the WT, including those who harrassed DH, believe that we should excuse these people, (JWs) because they are 'sincere.
So, does being 'sincere' about a belief or your beliefs mean that everyone else has to 'let' you do what you think is right and 'let you off' the repurcussions of those beliefs and actions and even 'punish' those who disagree with you?
SINCERE is a very overrated word in my opinion and too many people use it as a shield to protect them from the repurcussions of their actions.
The same applies to the world RELIGION! Call yourself a religion and a sincere religionist, and you appear to be able to get away with murder and if not that, then at least harrassing people!
Jehovah's Witnesses HARRASS the general public. They are sincere in their belief that this harrassment is justified! Because they call themselves a 'religion' they are permitted to harrass people in this way!
Isn't it time the general public were given the right to insist that this type of harrassment is stopped.....finally, once and for all!