At what point in time will you admit that it's over, scholar?
Surely there is an expiration date on this delusion.
607 BCE - Jehovah's Witnesses come out and Defend your Beliefs.
by KW13 16 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
deaconbluez
You are talking blatant nonsense. The Bible does not say that the 'calling to account' applies to the events of 539 BCE with the Fall of Babylon. This is impossible because Daniel discerned that the seventy years was at the time of writing Daniel 9:2 that the period was then yet unfulfilled. The seventy years ended only when the Jewish exiles returned home in 537 BCE. So, 539 is also impossible because 'the calling to account; which happened after 539 BCE was the desolation of Babylon which happened long after 539 BCE.
The seventy years beginning in 609 BCE is not widely accepted as others propose 605 BCE so there is no definitive event is mutually agreed for the beginning. Jeremiah describes the period as exile-servitude-desolation and could have begun when Nebuchadnezzer destroyed Jerusalem in his 18th regnal year in 607 BCE.
...probably the most dillusional post I've ever seen on JWD.
-
KW13
Scholar using your literature, the dates the Kings Ruled.
Nabonidus: 17 Years
Labashi-Marduk: Less than 9 Months
Neriglissar - 4 Years
Evil-Merodach - 2 Years
2 yrs Nebuchadnezzar II 43 Years
ALL THESE DATES COME FROM WBT Society Literature.
Add the years of all these together...
66 Years and 9 Months. 539 + 66 Years = 605...
Odd that. -
nvrgnbk
At what point in time will you admit that it's over, scholar?
Surely there is an expiration date on this delusion.
I asked you a similar question months ago, scholar.
You didn't answer it then.
Will you answer it now?
What good is chronology if you can't arrive at something definitive?
-
deaconbluez
It's already expired, guys.
-
nvrgnbk
It's already expired, guys.
So that's what smells!
-
Honesty
Oh come on- dont. Scholar will come crawling out of the woodwork stilla
Too Late He's Baaaack