tijkmo,
: oscillating syllogism non?
You wouldn't know a syllogism from your butt.
Firstly, a syllogism is an argument, and your statement dealt not with an argument from the poster you attacked, but a with a few statements which you, in your infinite wisdom presumed to call a syllogism. There was no syllogism in those few statements. A syllogism is two assertions and a conclucion which must necessarily follow from those assertions.
So, for the dummies in here, including me, please state what those two assertions were and the conclusion that was made based upon those assertions. Please be specific.
Please don't oscillate, obfuscate, and please don't bloviate. No one likes any of those nasty traits, except those who exhibit them.
Farkel