Doesn't sending someone this count as "persecution"?
This sounds like YouKnow/ WT prophet
by Dogpatch 24 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
serendipity
This sounds more like 3rd Witness than "You Know".
-
proplog2
It had too many grammatical errors to be from King. You can say what you want about King, but he writes better than that E-mail.
-
Dagney
It had too many grammatical errors to be from King. You can say what you want about King, but he writes better than that E-mail.
I was going to say the same thing. And it really doesn't sound like King to me.
-
carla
The only ones I know that take the UN seriously are jw's. I know military folks, regular folks, athiests, and Christians none of who take the UN serious. Obviously other countries do not take the UN very seriously either. What is wrong with this person? Kind of scary how delusional some people are, isn't it?
-
Hortensia
bulls*** bulls***
sounds like bulls*** to me, to me
(sung to the tune of "Daisy") -
bibleepal
Randy, At the bottom of this is an article speaking about what you and your friends laughed at me about, and made the butt of your jokes. Looks like Satan is laughing all the way to the UN. This is the final reply from me. I am going to leave you and your friends to Jehovah. Maybe you and your friends thought I was joking...looks like the joke will be on you. This is only the treaties you "HAVE" seen. So you keep on thinking that WTS had it all wrong. I came from the world, so I know what's really out there. In case you and your friends want a real laugh let's see if you know how the UN has already tried to take away your right to home and land ownership? So you guys just keep up the humor and laugh. You might though want to consider visiting your local hall, and speaking with your elders about getting reinstate it.
Randy, how could you know that Satan caused trouble in heaven, and think that because something went wrong at Bethel, nothing was worth salvaging? You now have complete tear down ministry. Don't see any scriptures about God supporting tear down ministries. What happened to love your enemy? Is that another scripture to be ignored? You are not doing any thing more positive than those you accuse. They on the other hand don't tear you down. I am just telling you from an outsiders perspective. But, like I said. You and your crew "keep laughing...Just don't forget, I told you so." I sincerely hope you will repent and ask Jehovah forgiveness. Really.
Take care.
JEHOVAH..FROM TIME INDEFINITE TO TIME INDEFINITE..REPENT WHILE YOU CAN!
WND Exclusive THE NEW WORLD DISORDER
Bush to pressure Senate to revive U.N. sea treaty
Critics say it would put 70% of Earth under control of global bureaucracy
Posted: May 13, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
WASHINGTON – In a move that has already angered some of his most ardent supporters, President Bush has asked the Democratic leadership in the U.S. Senate to revive a proposal for ratification of the United Nation's Law of the Sea Treaty, an international agreement defeated two years ago by Republican leadership in the upper house.
Critics say ratification would compromise U.S. sovereignty and place 70 percent of the Earth's surface under the control of the U.N. – even providing for a "tax" that would be paid directly to the international body by companies mining in the world's oceans.
The battle over the Law of the Sea Treaty first began 25 years ago, eventually being torpedoed by President Reagan. It resurfaced in 2004 under the sponsorship of Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and was successfully defeated by then Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.
President Bush announced his intention to seek reintroduction of LOST for ratification to a small group of trusted Republican grass-roots organizers last week – an announcement that was met with horror and scorn.
Eagle Forum leader Phyllis Schlafly, Center for Security Policy President Frank Gaffney, Leadership Institute President Morton Blackwell, Free Congress Foundation founder Paul Weyrich and leaders of the Heritage Foundation were quick to denounce the idea in forceful terms, calling on their members to begin lobbying the White House immediately.
(Story continues below)
LOST has long had the support of environmental groups such as the Natural Resources Defense Council.
It would establish rules governing the uses of the of the world's oceans – treating waters more than 200 nautical miles off coasts as the purview of a new international U.N. bureaucracy, the International Seabed Authority
The ISA would have the authority to set production controls for ocean mining, drilling and fishing, regulate ocean exploration, issue permits and settle disputes in its own new "court."
Companies seeking to mine or fish would be required to apply for a permit, paying a royalty fee
Critics also point out the new U.N. agency would have the right to compete directly with private companies in those profit-making activities.
The U.S. would have only one vote of 140 – and no veto power as it has on the U.N. Security Council.
The Bush administration claims the initiative for reintroduction of the treaty comes from the military, which likes the 12-mile territorial limits it places on national claims to waters. Yet, critics point out international law already protects non-aggressive passage, including non-wartime activities of military ships.
One of the main authors of LOST not only admired Karl Marx but was an ardent advocate of the Marxist-oriented New International Economic Order. Elisabeth Mann Borgese, a socialist who ran the World Federalists of Canada, played a critical role in crafting and promoting LOST, as WND reported in 2005.
Borgese was hailed by her U.N. supporters as the "Mother of the Oceans" or "First Lady of the Oceans." She died in 2002.
The youngest daughter of the German novelist Thomas Mann, Borgese openly favored world government, wrote for the left-wing The Nation magazine and was a member of a "Committee to Frame a World Constitution." She served as director of the International Center for Ocean Development and chairman of the International Oceans Institute at Dalhousie University in Canada.
The U.N. Environment Program, UNEP, has said that Borgese recognized the oceans as "a possible test-bed for ideas she had developed concerning a common global constitution."
Borgese received UNEP's "Environment Prize" in 1987 and was credited with organizing the conferences that "served to lay the foundation" for the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea, according to Dalhousie University, which houses her archives.
In a 1995 speech, pro-U.N. Democratic Sen. Claiborne Pell said Borgese's ideas were "embodied in the negotiated texts of the Law of the Sea Convention."
Her ideas included recognizing the oceans as the "common heritage of mankind" and creating an International Seabed Authority to charge U.S. and foreign companies for the right to mine the ocean floor.
In a January 1999 speech, Borgese declared, "The world ocean has been, and is, so to speak, our great laboratory for the making of a new world order."
In an article titled, "The New International Economic Order and the Law of the Sea," she argued that the pact could "reinforce" the goals of the NIEO by giving Third World countries a role in managing access to the oceans.
In a 1997 interview, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation broadcaster Philip Coulter asked Borgese about the collapse of Soviet-style communism and the triumph of the "elites."
Borgese replied "there is a strong counter-trend. It's not called socialism, but it's called sustainable development, which calls ... for the eradication of poverty. There is that trend and that is the trend that I am working on."
The concept of "sustainable development," considered a euphemism for socialism or communism, has been embraced in various pronouncements by the U.N. and even the U.S. government.
In her book, "The Oceanic Circle: Governing the Seas as a Global Resource," she approvingly cites Karl Marx, the father of communism, as someone with "amazing foresight" about the problems faced by urban and rural societies. The book is available from the liberal Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C.
In an article co-authored with an international lawyer, Borgese noted how LOST stipulates that the oceans "shall be reserved for peaceful purposes" and that "any threat or use of force, inconsistent with the United Nations Charter, is prohibited."
She argued LOST prohibits the ability of nuclear submarines from the U.S. and other nations to rove freely through the world's oceans. -
horrible life
Dude, what about global warming. Does the working together of nations doing that, have the same meaning as it is with the oceans? Or are you a Gore kisser-upper, and everything he says is wonderful.
Granted I did not read your whole post. Kinda dry.
-
Aphrodite
Bibleepal, please stop persecuting us in this way. You just are making me cling more strongly to my beliefs you know.
-
JK666
Bibleepal seems to be a few bricks shy of a load!
JK